IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v78y2024i4p481-487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Misuses of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test for One-Sample Goodness-of-Fit

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Zeimbekakis
  • Elizabeth D. Schifano
  • Jun Yan

Abstract

The Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test is widely employed to assess the goodness-of-fit of a hypothesized continuous distribution to a sample. Despite its popularity, the test is frequently misused in the literature and practice. While originally intended for independent, continuous data with precisely specified hypothesized distributions, it is erroneously applied to scenarios with dependent, discrete, or rounded data, with hypothesized distributions requiring estimated parameters. For example, it has been “discovered” multiple times that the test is too conservative when the hypothesized distribution has parameters that need to be estimated. We demonstrate misuses of the one-sample KS test in three scenarios through simulation studies: (a) the hypothesized distribution has unspecified parameters; (b) the data are serially dependent; and (c) a combination of the first two scenarios. For each scenario, we provide remedies for practical applications using appropriate bootstrap approaches. The whole demonstration can be used as hands-on education materials on both goodness-of-fit tests and bootstrap.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Zeimbekakis & Elizabeth D. Schifano & Jun Yan, 2024. "On Misuses of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test for One-Sample Goodness-of-Fit," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(4), pages 481-487, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:78:y:2024:i:4:p:481-487
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2024.2356095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2024.2356095
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2024.2356095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:78:y:2024:i:4:p:481-487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.