Author
Listed:
- Minh Nguyen
- Tiffany Eulalio
- Ben J. Marafino
- Christian Rose
- Jonathan H. Chen
- Michael Baiocchi
Abstract
A gap remains between developing risk prediction models and deploying models to support real-world decision making, especially in high-stakes situations. Human-experts’ reasoning abilities remain critical in identifying potential improvements and ensuring safety. We propose a thick data analytics (TDA) framework for eliciting and combining expert-human insight into the evaluation of models. The insight is 3-fold: (a) statistical methods are limited to using joint distributions of observable quantities for predictions but often there is more information available in a real-world than what is usable for algorithms, (b) domain experts can access more information (e.g., patient files) than an algorithm and bring additional knowledge into their assessments through leveraging insights and experiences, and (c) experts can re-frame and re-evaluate prediction problems to suit real-world situations. Here, we revisit an example of predicting temporal risk for intensive care admission within 24 hr of hospitalization. We propose a sampling procedure for identifying informative cases for deeper inspection. Expert feedback is used to understand sources of information to improve model development and deployment. We recommend model assessment based on objective evaluation metrics derived from subjective evaluations of the problem formulation. TDA insights facilitate iterative model development toward safer, actionable, and acceptable risk predictions.
Suggested Citation
Minh Nguyen & Tiffany Eulalio & Ben J. Marafino & Christian Rose & Jonathan H. Chen & Michael Baiocchi, 2024.
"Thick Data Analytics (TDA): An Iterative and Inductive Framework for Algorithmic Improvement,"
The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(4), pages 456-464, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:amstat:v:78:y:2024:i:4:p:456-464
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2024.2327535
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:78:y:2024:i:4:p:456-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.