IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v78y2024i3p280-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One-Step Weighting to Generalize and Transport Treatment Effect Estimates to a Target Population

Author

Listed:
  • Ambarish Chattopadhyay
  • Eric R. Cohn
  • José R. Zubizarreta

Abstract

The problems of generalization and transportation of treatment effect estimates from a study sample to a target population are central to empirical research and statistical methodology. In both randomized experiments and observational studies, weighting methods are often used with this objective. Traditional methods construct the weights by separately modeling the treatment assignment and study selection probabilities and then multiplying functions (e.g., inverses) of their estimates. In this work, we provide a justification and an implementation for weighting in a single step. We show a formal connection between this one-step method and inverse probability and inverse odds weighting. We demonstrate that the resulting estimator for the target average treatment effect is consistent, asymptotically Normal, multiply robust, and semiparametrically efficient. We evaluate the performance of the one-step estimator in a simulation study. We illustrate its use in a case study on the effects of physician racial diversity on preventive healthcare utilization among Black men in California. We provide R code implementing the methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Ambarish Chattopadhyay & Eric R. Cohn & José R. Zubizarreta, 2024. "One-Step Weighting to Generalize and Transport Treatment Effect Estimates to a Target Population," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(3), pages 280-289, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:78:y:2024:i:3:p:280-289
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2023.2267598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2023.2267598
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2023.2267598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:78:y:2024:i:3:p:280-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.