Author
Listed:
- Chixiang Chen
- Shuo Chen
- Qi Long
- Sudeshna Das
- Ming Wang
Abstract
An assessment of the causal treatment effect in the development and progression of certain diseases is important in clinical trials and biomedical studies. However, it is not possible to infer a causal relationship when the treatment assignment is imbalanced and confounded by other mechanisms. Specifically, when the treatment assignment is not randomized and the primary outcome is binary, a conventional logistic regression may not be valid to elucidate any causal inference. Moreover, exclusively capturing all confounders is extremely difficult and even impossible in large-scale observational studies. We propose a multiple-model-based robust (MultiMR) estimator for estimating the causal effect with a binary outcome, where multiple propensity score models and conditional mean imputation models are used to ensure estimation robustness. Furthermore, we propose an enhanced MultiMR (eMultiMR) estimator that reduces the estimation variability of MultiMR estimates by incorporating secondary outcomes that are highly correlated with the primary binary outcome. The resulting estimates are less sensitive to model mis-specification compared to those based on state-of-the-art doubly-robust methods. These estimates are verified through both theoretical and numerical assessments. The utility of (e)MultiMR estimation is illustrated using the Uniform Data Set (UDS) from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center with the objective of detecting the causal effect of the short-term use of antihypertensive medications on the development of dementia or mild cognitive impairment. The proposed method has been implemented in an R package and is available at https://github.com/chencxxy28/eMultiMR.
Suggested Citation
Chixiang Chen & Shuo Chen & Qi Long & Sudeshna Das & Ming Wang, 2024.
"Multiple-Model-based Robust Estimation of Causal Treatment Effect on a Binary Outcome with Integrated Information from Secondary Outcomes,"
The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(2), pages 150-160, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:amstat:v:78:y:2024:i:2:p:150-160
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2023.2250399
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:78:y:2024:i:2:p:150-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.