IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v77y2023i1p1-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian Testing of Linear Versus Nonlinear Effects Using Gaussian Process Priors

Author

Listed:
  • Joris Mulder

Abstract

A Bayes factor is proposed for testing whether the effect of a key predictor variable on a dependent variable is linear or nonlinear, possibly while controlling for certain covariates. The test can be used (i) in substantive research for assessing the nature of the relationship between certain variables based on scientific expectations, and (ii) for statistical model building to infer whether a (transformed) variable should be added as a linear or nonlinear predictor in a regression model. Under the nonlinear model, a Gaussian process prior is employed using a parameterization similar to Zellner’s g prior resulting in a scale-invariant test. Unlike existing p-values, the proposed Bayes factor can be used for quantifying the relative evidence in the data in favor of linearity. Furthermore the Bayes factor does not overestimate the evidence against the linear null model resulting in more parsimonious models. An extension is proposed for Bayesian one-sided testing of whether a nonlinear effect is consistently positive, consistently negative, or neither. Applications are provided from various fields including social network research and education.

Suggested Citation

  • Joris Mulder, 2023. "Bayesian Testing of Linear Versus Nonlinear Effects Using Gaussian Process Priors," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:1:p:1-11
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2028675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2022.2028675
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2022.2028675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:1:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.