Author
Listed:
- Irene Epifanio
- M. Victoria Ibáñez
- Amelia Simó
Abstract
In this article, we propose several methodologies for handling missing or incomplete data in archetype analysis (AA) and archetypoid analysis (ADA). AA seeks to find archetypes, which are convex combinations of data points, and to approximate the samples as mixtures of those archetypes. In ADA, the representative archetypal data belong to the sample, that is, they are actual data points. With the proposed procedures, missing data are not discarded or previously filled by imputation and the theoretical properties regarding location of archetypes are guaranteed, unlike the previous approaches. The new procedures adapt the AA algorithm either by considering the missing values in the computation of the solution or by skipping them. In the first case, the solutions of previous approaches are modified to fulfill the theory and a new procedure is proposed, where the missing values are updated by the fitted values. In this second case, the procedure is based on the estimation of dissimilarities between samples and the projection of these dissimilarities in a new space, where AA or ADA is applied, and those results are used to provide a solution in the original space. A comparative analysis is carried out in a simulation study, with favorable results. The methodology is also applied to two real datasets: a well-known climate dataset and a global development dataset. We illustrate how these unsupervised methodologies allow complex data to be understood, even by nonexperts. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Suggested Citation
Irene Epifanio & M. Victoria Ibáñez & Amelia Simó, 2020.
"Archetypal Analysis With Missing Data: See All Samples by Looking at a Few Based on Extreme Profiles,"
The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(2), pages 169-183, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:amstat:v:74:y:2020:i:2:p:169-183
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2018.1545700
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:74:y:2020:i:2:p:169-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.