IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v71y2017i4p336-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching Decision Theory Proof Strategies Using a Crowdsourcing Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Luís Gustavo Esteves
  • Rafael Izbicki
  • Rafael Bassi Stern

Abstract

Teaching how to derive minimax decision rules can be challenging because of the lack of examples that are simple enough to be used in the classroom. Motivated by this challenge, we provide a new example that illustrates the use of standard techniques in the derivation of optimal decision rules under the Bayes and minimax approaches. We discuss how to predict the value of an unknown quantity, θ ∈ {0, 1}, given the opinions of n experts. An important example of such crowdsourcing problem occurs in modern cosmology, where θ indicates whether a given galaxy is merging or not, and Y1, …, Yn are the opinions from n astronomers regarding θ. We use the obtained prediction rules to discuss advantages and disadvantages of the Bayes and minimax approaches to decision theory. The material presented here is intended to be taught to first-year graduate students.

Suggested Citation

  • Luís Gustavo Esteves & Rafael Izbicki & Rafael Bassi Stern, 2017. "Teaching Decision Theory Proof Strategies Using a Crowdsourcing Problem," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(4), pages 336-343, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:71:y:2017:i:4:p:336-343
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1264316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2016.1264316
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2016.1264316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:71:y:2017:i:4:p:336-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.