IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v71y2017i3p249-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resolving a Multi-Million Dollar Contract Dispute With a Latin Square

Author

Listed:
  • William B. Fairley
  • Peter J. Kempthorne
  • Julie Novak
  • Scott McGarvie
  • Steve Crunk
  • Bee Leng Lee
  • Alan J. Salzberg

Abstract

The City of New York negotiated a dispute over the performance of new garbage trucks purchased from a vehicle manufacturer. The dispute concerned the fulfillment of a specification in the purchase contract that the trucks load a minimum full-load of 12.5 tons of household refuse. On behalf of the City, but in cooperation with the manufacturer, the City's Department of Sanitation and consulting statisticians tested fulfillment of the contract specification, employing a Latin Square design for routing trucks. We present the classical analysis using a linear model and analysis of variance. We also show how fixed, mixed, and random effect models are useful in analyzing the results of the test. Finally, we take a Bayesian perspective to demonstrate how the information from the data overcomes the difference between the prior densities of the city and the manufacturer for the load capacities of the trucks to result in much closer posterior densities. This procedure might prove useful in similar negotiations. Supplementary material including the data and R code for computations in the article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • William B. Fairley & Peter J. Kempthorne & Julie Novak & Scott McGarvie & Steve Crunk & Bee Leng Lee & Alan J. Salzberg, 2017. "Resolving a Multi-Million Dollar Contract Dispute With a Latin Square," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 249-258, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:71:y:2017:i:3:p:249-258
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1256231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2016.1256231
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2016.1256231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:71:y:2017:i:3:p:249-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.