IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v71y2017i3p202-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sufficiency Revisited: Rethinking Statistical Algorithms in the Big Data Era

Author

Listed:
  • Jarod Y. L. Lee
  • James J. Brown
  • Louise M. Ryan

Abstract

The big data era demands new statistical analysis paradigms, since traditional methods often break down when datasets are too large to fit on a single desktop computer. Divide and Recombine (D&R) is becoming a popular approach for big data analysis, where results are combined over subanalyses performed in separate data subsets. In this article, we consider situations where unit record data cannot be made available by data custodians due to privacy concerns, and explore the concept of statistical sufficiency and summary statistics for model fitting. The resulting approach represents a type of D&R strategy, which we refer to as summary statistics D&R; as opposed to the standard approach, which we refer to as horizontal D&R. We demonstrate the concept via an extended Gamma–Poisson model, where summary statistics are extracted from different databases and incorporated directly into the fitting algorithm without having to combine unit record data. By exploiting the natural hierarchy of data, our approach has major benefits in terms of privacy protection. Incorporating the proposed modelling framework into data extraction tools such as TableBuilder by the Australian Bureau of Statistics allows for potential analysis at a finer geographical level, which we illustrate with a multilevel analysis of the Australian unemployment data. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarod Y. L. Lee & James J. Brown & Louise M. Ryan, 2017. "Sufficiency Revisited: Rethinking Statistical Algorithms in the Big Data Era," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 202-208, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:71:y:2017:i:3:p:202-208
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1255659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2016.1255659
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2016.1255659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bon Joshua J. & Baffour Bernard & Spallek Melanie & Haynes Michele, 2020. "Analysing Sensitive Data from Dynamically-Generated Overlapping Contingency Tables," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 275-296, June.
    2. Bon Joshua J. & Baffour Bernard & Spallek Melanie & Haynes Michele, 2020. "Analysing Sensitive Data from Dynamically-Generated Overlapping Contingency Tables," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 275-296, June.
    3. Shuang Zhang & Xingdong Feng, 2022. "Distributed identification of heterogeneous treatment effects," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 57-89, March.
    4. Wang, Wenting & Shi, Shijie & Fu, Xianghua, 2022. "The subnetwork investigation of scale-free networks based on the self-similarity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Ding‐Geng Chen & Dungang Liu & Xiaoyi Min & Heping Zhang, 2020. "Relative efficiency of using summary versus individual data in random‐effects meta‐analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1319-1329, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:71:y:2017:i:3:p:202-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.