IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v67y2013i2p67-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the Exterior Match to Compare Two Entwined Matched Control Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Paul R. Rosenbaum
  • Jeffrey H. Silber

Abstract

When comparing outcomes, such as survival, in two groups- say a focal group and a comparison group-a common question is whether an adjustment for certain baseline differences that separate these two groups actually matters for the difference in outcomes. Did the adjustment matter? If it did matter, to what quantitative extent did it matter? This question is quite distinct from whether the baseline variables predict the outcome: baseline variables may predict the outcome, yet explain no part of the difference in outcomes in two groups. The question is also distinct from whether a difference between the groups remains after adjustment: an adjustment may matter quite a bit, yet fail to explain a substantial part of the difference in outcomes, and, indeed, adjustment may increase the difference. Whether an adjustment for ( x 1 , x 2 ) matters over and above an adjustment for x 1 alone can be addressed by comparing outcomes in two control groups formed from the comparison group, one matched to the focal group for x 1 alone, the other matched to focal group for ( x 1 , x 2 ). How do outcomes differ in these two matched control groups? If two control groups are each pair-matched to the same focal group, then the result is a set of matched triples, so controls in the two groups are implicitly matched to each other by virtue of being matched to the same person in the focal group. When the comparison group is vastly larger than the focal group and their distributions exhibit extensive overlap on ( x 1 , x 2 ), it may be possible to construct nonintersecting matched control groups, but quite often the comparison group is large enough to yield closely matched groups one at a time, but is not large enough to produce several nonintersecting matched control groups. How can one compare two matched control groups that are entwined, with some of the same controls in both groups? Two entwined control groups have a nonempty intersection: some of the same controls appear in both groups as duplicates. These duplicates may appear in the same matched triple, but more commonly they appear in different matched triples. This structure yields a new nonintersecting match that we call the exterior match. Properties of the exterior match are discussed. Our on-going study of black-versus-white disparities in survival following breast cancer in Medicare motivated this work and is used to illustrate.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul R. Rosenbaum & Jeffrey H. Silber, 2013. "Using the Exterior Match to Compare Two Entwined Matched Control Groups," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(2), pages 67-75, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:67:y:2013:i:2:p:67-75
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2013.769914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2013.769914
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2013.769914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samuel D. Pimentel & Dylan S. Small & Paul R. Rosenbaum, 2016. "Constructed Second Control Groups and Attenuation of Unmeasured Biases," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(515), pages 1157-1167, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:67:y:2013:i:2:p:67-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.