IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v66y2012i3p163-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Closed Sequential and Multistage Inference on Binary Responses With or Without Replacement

Author

Listed:
  • Iliana Ignatova
  • Roland C. Deutsch
  • Don Edwards

Abstract

We consider closed sequential or multistage sampling, with or without replacement, from a lot of N items, where each item can be identified as defective (in error, tainted, etc.) or not. The goal is to make inference on the proportion, π, of defectives in the lot, or equivalently on the number of defectives in the lot D = N π. It is shown that exact inference on π using closed (bounded) sequential or multistage procedures with general prespecified elimination boundaries is completely tractable and not at all inconvenient using modern statistical software. We give relevant theory and demonstrate functions for this purpose written in R (R Development Core Team 2005, available as online supplementary material). Applicability of the methodology is illustrated in three examples: (1) sharpening of Wald's (1947) sequential probability ratio test used in industrial acceptance sampling, (2) two-stage sampling for auditing Medicare or Medicaid health care providers, and (3) risk-limited sequential procedures for election audits.

Suggested Citation

  • Iliana Ignatova & Roland C. Deutsch & Don Edwards, 2012. "Closed Sequential and Multistage Inference on Binary Responses With or Without Replacement," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(3), pages 163-172, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:66:y:2012:i:3:p:163-172
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2012.722901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2012.722901
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2012.722901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tahir Ekin & Francesca Ieva & Fabrizio Ruggeri & Refik Soyer, 2017. "On the Use of the Concentration Function in Medical Fraud Assessment," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 236-241, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:66:y:2012:i:3:p:163-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.