Author
Listed:
- Jean Kellie
- Eileen Henderson
- Brian Milsom
- Hayley Crawley
Abstract
This account of practice reports on an action learning initiative designed and implemented in partnership between a regional NHS Acute Trust and a UK Business School. The central initiative was the implementation of an action learning programme entitled ‘Leading change in tissue viability best practice: a development programme for Link Nurse Practitioners’. The purpose was primarily to foster ‘leadership’ in best practice, in frontline nursing staff who have a specific ward-based responsibility regarding ‘tissue viability’, that is the prevention and management of pressure ulcers and wounds. The approach engaged the active involvement of nurses to become problem identifiers and solvers and key influencers in improving practice. The initiative utilized action learning principles to draw out the real experience of nursing staff to identify and analyze the current situation regarding practices around tissue viability issues, to identify significant improvement areas and develop action and implementation plans to achieve improvements. The process of meeting, sharing experience and action planning took place several times over a five-month period from July to December 2009. The initiative is enveloped within a stand-alone University accredited module of the same title accruing 20 credits at level 4. This account provides a timely opportunity to reflect on and evaluate the outcomes of the initiative and the process of learning engaged in by the participants. The initiative was supported and funded by the regional NHS Strategic Health Authority as part of its commitment to improvements in ‘Patient safety’ (National Audit Office -- 2005. London: The Stationery Office).
Suggested Citation
Jean Kellie & Eileen Henderson & Brian Milsom & Hayley Crawley, 2010.
"Leading change in tissue viability best practice: an action learning programme for link nurse practitioners,"
Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 213-219, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:alresp:v:7:y:2010:i:2:p:213-219
DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2010.488340
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:7:y:2010:i:2:p:213-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CALR20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.