IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/alresp/v15y2018i2p139-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A blended learning curriculum for training peer researchers to conduct community-based participatory research

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew D. Eaton
  • Francisco Ibáñez-Carrasco
  • Shelley L. Craig
  • Soo Chan Carusone
  • Michael Montess
  • Gordon A. Wells
  • Galo F. Ginocchio

Abstract

Peer researchers (PRs) are research team members who share traits (e.g. gender, age, sexual orientation, diagnosis, income, housing situation, etc.) with study participants. Participatory methods and some fields (e.g. HIV/AIDS) expect PRs to be equitably involved in a project. Moreover, in Canada, there is a current impetus to include ‘the patient’ in health research. PRs often join a project without any formal research training, yet they are frequently tasked with suggesting appropriate language, recruiting participants, conducting interviews, administering surveys, analyzing data, and presenting findings. While there is literature on PR hiring, ethical considerations of PR engagement, and PR experiences, the methods of training PRs remain underreported. A blended learning curriculum (i.e. combination of webinars, didactic in-person presentation, filmed simulation, etc.), informed by the principles of action learning and the concept of reciprocity, has shown preliminary effectiveness in training PRs across two studies. This paper will present the curriculum, alongside exploratory evaluation results (n = 7), with details on how the curriculum changed from one study to the next and how reciprocity between academic and peer researchers led to stronger collaborations.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew D. Eaton & Francisco Ibáñez-Carrasco & Shelley L. Craig & Soo Chan Carusone & Michael Montess & Gordon A. Wells & Galo F. Ginocchio, 2018. "A blended learning curriculum for training peer researchers to conduct community-based participatory research," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 139-150, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:139-150
    DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2018.1462143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2018.1462143
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14767333.2018.1462143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Skipton Leonard & Michael J. Marquardt, 2010. "The evidence for the effectiveness of action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 121-136, April.
    2. Kate Thornton & Pak Yoong, 2011. "The role of the blended action learning facilitator: an enabler of learning and a trusted inquisitor," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 129-146, March.
    3. Michael Marquardt & Deborah Waddill, 2004. "The power of learning in action learning: a conceptual analysis of how the five schools of adult learning theories are incorporated within the practice of action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 185-202, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohsin Raza & Rimsha Khalid & Larisa Ivascu & Jati Kasuma, 2023. "Education Beats at the Heart of the Sustainability in Thailand: The Role of Institutional Awareness, Image, Experience, and Student Volunteer Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Marj Plumb & Senaida Fernandez Poole & Heather Sarantis & Susan Braun & Janna Cordeiro & Juliana Van Olphen & Marion Kavanaugh-Lynch, 2019. "Development and Evaluation of a Training Program for Community-Based Participatory Research in Breast Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheri Speier-Pero, 2018. "Leveraging Experiential Field Projects—Discovery Learning in a Masters in Analytics Program," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 162-173, May.
    2. Janice Byrne & Frédéric Delmar & Alain Fayolle & Wadid Lamine, 2016. "Training corporate entrepreneurs: an action learning approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 479-506, August.
    3. Martha Mumbi Simwanza & Olawumi Dele Awolusi, 2020. "Customer Experience Monitoring: A Study of Zambian Banks," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17.
    4. Karen Johson & Akil Amiraly, 2017. "Bringing entrepreneurial methods into the scientific classroom [L'introduction d'une approche entrepreneuriale dans un cours de sciences fondamentales]," Post-Print hal-01574725, HAL.
    5. Rens Kortmann & Vincent Peters, 2021. "Becoming the Unseen Helmsman - Game facilitator competencies for novice, experienced, and non-game facilitators," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(3), pages 255-272, June.
    6. Alan Mumford, 2006. "Action learning: nothing so practical as a good theory," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(01), pages 69-76.
    7. Hinrichsen, Carsten & Nelausen, Malene Kubstrup & Nielsen, Line & Santini, Ziggi Ivan & Meilstrup, Charlotte & Rod, Morten Hulvej & Koushede, Vibeke & Lauridsen, Sigurd, 2022. "The workings of an action learning program for building mental health promotion capacity – A realist evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Bernhard Hauser, 2010. "Practising virtual action learning at university," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 229-235, April.
    9. Carmen Bălan & Daniela Ioniţă, 2011. "Exploratory Research on the Organizational Learning in Small Enterprises and Implications for the Economic Higher Education," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(30), pages 464-481, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:139-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CALR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.