IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/alresp/v13y2016i1p50-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Staying mindful in action: the challenge of ‘double awareness’ on task and process in an Action Lab

Author

Listed:
  • Lotte Svalgaard

Abstract

Action Learning is a well-proven method to integrate ‘task’ and ‘process’, as learning about team and self (process) takes place while delivering on a task or business challenge of real importance (task). An Action Lab-super-® is an intensive Action Learning programme lasting for 5 days, which aims at balancing and integrating individual challenges and business challenges, as well as the ‘Action’ and the ‘Learning’ of Action Learning. However, in spite of the aspiration to balance and integrate ‘task’ and ‘process’, a tendency and a challenge is experienced: When deeply involved in delivering on a business challenge, participants tend to shy away from or see reflection on the process as disturbing or disrupting. This tendency is like a seesaw: When the pressure of the task increases, awareness about the process goes down. This account of practice aims at exposing and understanding better this tendency by sharing a study looking into what hinders and promotes mindful awareness on the process, while dealing with a business challenge in an Action Lab-super-®. Drawing on the findings, the account of practice will share some recommendations for the Action Learning facilitator to take up the challenge of integrating task and process whenever the seesaw is tipping.

Suggested Citation

  • Lotte Svalgaard, 2016. "Staying mindful in action: the challenge of ‘double awareness’ on task and process in an Action Lab," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 50-59, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:50-59
    DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2015.1130350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2015.1130350
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14767333.2015.1130350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jane Robertson & Diane Bell, 2017. "Safe or unsafe? The paradox of action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 185-196, May.
    2. Kaklauskas, A. & Bardauskiene, D. & Cerkauskiene, R. & Ubarte, I. & Raslanas, S. & Radvile, E. & Kaklauskaite, U. & Kaklauskiene, L., 2021. "Emotions analysis in public spaces for urban planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:50-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CALR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.