IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v31y2022i4p347-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why aren’t more minority accounting students choosing auditing? An examination of career choice and perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Josette Edwards Pelzer
  • Porschia Nkansa

Abstract

The underrepresentation of minority professionals in audit persists despite ongoing counterefforts by accounting firms and faculty. We conduct 19 semi-structured interviews with minority (Black and Hispanic) and nonminority (White) accounting majors and document their perceptions of the audit profession. We evaluate responses in the context of social cognitive career theory, which links one’s self-efficacy beliefs and outcome expectations to the intention to pursue a particular career path. Our findings indicate both minority and nonminority participants had an overall positive perception of the audit profession and believed they could have successful careers in auditing. However, minority students discussed more audit-related negative self-efficacy experiences than their nonminority counterparts. We conclude by recommending that accounting firm and other stakeholder initiatives include audit mentorship programs targeted specifically at minority accounting majors early in their accounting programs to generate positive (and combat negative) audit-related self-efficacy experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Josette Edwards Pelzer & Porschia Nkansa, 2022. "Why aren’t more minority accounting students choosing auditing? An examination of career choice and perceptions," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 347-369, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:347-369
    DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2021.1991404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09639284.2021.1991404
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639284.2021.1991404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:347-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.