IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v30y2021i2p131-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teamwork in the accounting curriculum: stakeholder expectations, accounting students’ value proposition, and instructors’ guidance

Author

Listed:
  • Heinrich Oosthuizen
  • Paul De Lange
  • Trevor Wilmshurst
  • Nicola Beatson

Abstract

Studies have reported that employers, graduates, and other stakeholders do not believe that higher education curricula facilitate the development of teamwork competencies adequately. In response to calls from Kennedy and Dull [(2008) Transferable team skills for accounting students. Accounting Education, 17(2), 213–224] and Levant et al. [(2016) Business simulation as an active learning activity for developing soft skills. Accounting Education, 25(4), 368–395], we take a qualitative approach to explore the views of Master of Professional Accounting students on the value propositions of process controls and educator-led support. In thematically analysing survey and interview responses, this study reports that effective process controls support teams by creating a constructive environment where social learning can take place. The study shows that without adequate educator-led guidance, increased accountability processes in teamwork lead to the circumvention of time-consuming activities and greater conflict in teams. We contribute an evidence-based schema that places instructor-guided teamwork process controls at the centre of constructivist learning. The schema links students’ value proposition of teamwork to the instructor’s ability to change student perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Heinrich Oosthuizen & Paul De Lange & Trevor Wilmshurst & Nicola Beatson, 2021. "Teamwork in the accounting curriculum: stakeholder expectations, accounting students’ value proposition, and instructors’ guidance," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 131-158, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:30:y:2021:i:2:p:131-158
    DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2020.1858321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09639284.2020.1858321
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639284.2020.1858321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bayne, Lyndie & Birt, Jacqueline & Hancock, Phil & Schonfeldt, Nikki & Agrawal, Prerana, 2022. "Best practices for group assessment tasks," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Liu, Chenyong & Ryan, David & Lin, Guoyu & Xu, Chunhao, 2023. "No rose without a thorn: Corporate teamwork culture and financial statement misconduct," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    3. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M., 2022. "Accounting education literature review (2021)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Monique Micallef & Cheryl Mifsud & Lauren Ellul & Peter J. Baldacchino & Simon Grima, 2023. "The Skill Set Required in the Accounting Workplace: Perspectives of Accounting Graduates and Warrant Holders," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 117-145.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:30:y:2021:i:2:p:131-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.