IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v55y2025i2p156-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stock market openness and audit fees: evidence from the inclusion of China A-shares in the MSCI emerging markets index

Author

Listed:
  • Rongli Yuan
  • Lisha Luo-Yang
  • Shengjie Xia

Abstract

This study examines how China’s stock market openness affects audit fees. In May 2018, Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) announced the first wave of listing of large-cap China A-shares in the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index, which marked China’s grand entrance into the global investment benchmark, and sharply expanded its stock market investor base. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that audit fees for constituent stocks decrease after the index inclusion. Further analyses suggest that foreign investors can reduce the risk of expropriation by controlling shareholders and mitigate agency conflicts. Our results also show that the effect is more pronounced for firms with weaker internal controls, lower levels of domestic institutional ownership, and those located in less developed markets. Our findings highlight the monitoring effect of stock market openness in improving corporate governance and advance our understanding of the key drivers of audit fees in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Rongli Yuan & Lisha Luo-Yang & Shengjie Xia, 2025. "Stock market openness and audit fees: evidence from the inclusion of China A-shares in the MSCI emerging markets index," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 156-187, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:2:p:156-187
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2023.2288580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2023.2288580
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2023.2288580?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:2:p:156-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.