IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v55y2025i1p69-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do social ties between two signatory auditors affect audit quality and firm value?

Author

Listed:
  • Xinxian Chen
  • Jean Jinghan Chen
  • Jason Zezhong Xiao

Abstract

We explore the effects of social ties (including alumni relations, regional connections and employment affiliation) between the two signatory auditors (engagement and review auditors) on audit quality in China. We find that client firms with socially connected auditors have lower audit quality. The negative effect is more pronounced when the two signatory auditors are partners in their audit firms or when financial irregularities exist in their client firms. Conversely, this adverse effect is alleviated if the two auditors have attended elite schools or work for one of the Big 4 audit firms. We further find that social ties between the two auditors is negatively associated with firm value through impaired market confidence, while this negative relationship can be partially explained by impaired audit quality. Overall, our results indicate that the costs of the two signatory auditors’ social ties outweigh their benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinxian Chen & Jean Jinghan Chen & Jason Zezhong Xiao, 2025. "Do social ties between two signatory auditors affect audit quality and firm value?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 69-104, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:1:p:69-104
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2024.2306531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2024.2306531
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2024.2306531?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:1:p:69-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.