IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v55y2025i1p1-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of cost stickiness on income smoothing: evidence from employment protection regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Andrei Filip
  • Junqi Liu
  • Daphne Lui

Abstract

Prior literature suggests that cost stickiness increases the ex-ante volatility and reduces the predictability of earnings. We examine whether managers intentionally undo such consequences by dampening earnings volatility. Exploiting the staggered adoption of wrongful discharge laws as an exogenous instrument for cost stickiness, we document that cost stickiness increases managers’ income-smoothing activities. This response is more pronounced in firms whose earnings are more sensitive to labour costs than their industry peers are and in firms with stronger information-provision incentives. Additional analyses indicate that income smoothing improves sticky-cost firms’ earnings informativeness and that the identified impact of cost stickiness is primarily driven by labour costs. Our results suggest that labour regulations can influence managers’ financial reporting incentives via cost behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei Filip & Junqi Liu & Daphne Lui, 2025. "The impact of cost stickiness on income smoothing: evidence from employment protection regulations," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 1-38, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:1:p:1-38
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2023.2266803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2023.2266803
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2023.2266803?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:1:p:1-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.