IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v54y2024i4p457-490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reframing imperial China’s indigenous accounting history: further discoveries in archival materials from the three centuries before 1850

Author

Listed:
  • Weipeng Yuan
  • Richard Macve

Abstract

How far did the indigenous accounting of China's historically successful economy parallel Western double-entry bookkeeping (DEB)? We propose a scheme for classifying stages of bookkeeping that approach full DEB, review recently available nineteenth century Chinese accounting manuals and re-examine how far their recommendations reflect practice to be found in original account books contained in the archives of the Zigong brine wells for 1916-1917 (which have been argued to be essentially unchanged from the nineteenth century Qing era and perhaps earlier) and in the surviving accounts of the Fēngshèngtài salt traders of Henan province spanning 1854-1881. We introduce the accounting records we have now discovered from merchanting businesses in Anhui province, which span 300 years and survive from the 1590s onwards. These are all more sophisticated than the ‘merchant-banking' accounts in the vast archive of Tŏng Tài Shēng covering 1798-1850, and in the case of the Anhui merchants' accounts comprise ‘balance sheets' that include monetary values for physical as well as monetary assets, matching their owners' ‘capital'. We tentatively conclude, on the basis of the evidence now emerging, that despite its variety of forms indigenous Chinese style accounting practice may in some cases have captured the structural essentials of DEB’s content and functions and might be labelled ‘Chinese-style double-entry bookkeeping' ('CDEB'), over which Western bookkeeping had no conceptual advantages.

Suggested Citation

  • Weipeng Yuan & Richard Macve, 2024. "Reframing imperial China’s indigenous accounting history: further discoveries in archival materials from the three centuries before 1850," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 457-490, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:54:y:2024:i:4:p:457-490
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2023.2294735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2023.2294735
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2023.2294735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:54:y:2024:i:4:p:457-490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.