IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v38y2008i1p21-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investor relations meetings: Evidence from the top 500 UK companies

Author

Listed:
  • Claire Marston

Abstract

Meetings with analysts and investors are an important part of the investor relations process. I develop a two‐dimensional dynamic model of investor relations and derive five research questions about investor relations with particular emphasis on investor relations meetings. To answer the questions I obtain data in 2002 from company managers using a questionnaire survey of top UK companies. Comparative data from 1991 is used to establish whether company‐ or market‐side change drivers have led to changes over time. A key research question seeks an explanation for the differences in level of IR activity between companies. I develop a cross‐sectional model and test the model using survey data. Key findings are that one‐to‐one meetings were ranked as the most important communication channel with analysts and investors both in 2002 and 1991. Companies were positive about their relationship with analysts and investors with similar perceptions to those held in 1991. An explanation of recent results, the creation of shareholder value and discussion of company strategy were rated as the most important issues discussed at IR meetings. The level of investor relations activity, as measured by the number of one‐to‐one meetings and audience size, had increased over the period. Agreater number of one‐to‐one meetings were held by companies with a higher number of institutional investors, greater analyst following, foreign listings, extreme market‐to‐book values and recently issued share capital. The size of the audience for investor relations meetings of all types was largely driven by company size and analyst following in respect of sell‐side analysts. The existence of foreign listings was the most important explanatory variable for the size of the audience of buy‐side analysts and fund managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Marston, 2008. "Investor relations meetings: Evidence from the top 500 UK companies," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 21-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:38:y:2008:i:1:p:21-48
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2008.9663318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2008.9663318
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2008.9663318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Houdou Basse Mama & Alexander Bassen, 2017. "Neglected disciplinary effects of investor relations: evidence from corporate cash holdings," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(2), pages 221-261, February.
    2. Shujun Ding & Chunxin Jia & Zhenyu Wu, 2016. "Mutual Fund Activism and Market Regulation During the Pre-IFRS Period: The Case of Earnings Informativeness in China from an Ethical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(4), pages 765-785, November.
    3. Houdou Basse Mama & Rachidi Kotchoni, 2017. "Investor Relations' Quality and Mispricing," Working Papers hal-04141636, HAL.
    4. Guillamon-Saorin, Encarna & Sousa, Carlos M.P., 2010. "Press release disclosures in Spain and the UK," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Nooraisah Katmon & Omar Al-Farooque, 2019. "The Reciprocal Relationship Between Earnings Management, Disclosure Quality and Board Independence: UK Evidence," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(5), pages 63-80, December.
    6. Barker, Richard & Hendry, John & Roberts, John & Sanderson, Paul, 2012. "Can company-fund manager meetings convey informational benefits? Exploring the rationalisation of equity investment decision making by UK fund managers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 207-222.
    7. Vineet Agarwal & Richard J. Taffler & Xijuan Bellotti & Elly A. Nash, 2016. "Investor relations, information asymmetry and market value," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 31-50, January.
    8. Armitage, Seth & Marston, Claire, 2008. "Corporate disclosure, cost of capital and reputation: Evidence from finance directors," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 314-336.
    9. Frank Schiemann & Kai Richter & Thomas Günther, 2010. "Voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital items in roadshows and investor conferences: an empirical analysis of DAX30-companies," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 255-275, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:38:y:2008:i:1:p:21-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.