IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v36y2006i1p19-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A bridge too far: a common conceptual framework for commercial and public benefit entities

Author

Listed:
  • Sheila Ellwood
  • Sue Newbury

Abstract

Writers and standard setters have propounded the adoption of private sector frameworks for the public sector. Ellwood (2003) examined the apparent ‘bridge’ between and across the sectors provided by UK GAAP and concluded that much work needed to be undertaken on the theoretical underpinning of Whole of Government Accounts, but WGA is progressing presuming the commercial model. There has been recent debate in the Antipodes as to whether conceptual frameworks can be common for the private and the public and not-for-profit sectors or whether such claimed commonality is a sham (Newberry, 2002). In the UK. the Accounting Standards Board (ASB) has produced a reinterpretation of the Statement of Principles for public benefit entities. This paper investigates the proposed Statement of Principles for public benefit entities (SoPpbe). There appears to be an inherent unsuitability of the current private sector framework for transference to ‘public benefit entities’. The balance sheet focus and the assumed objective of wealth creation are incomprehensible in a public or not-for-profit context. Changes in public service management embodied within New Public Management (NPM) led to the ascendancy of accruals accounting but this does not necessarily permit the adoption of a (reinterpreted) private sector conceptual framework. It is concluded that the differences are so fundamental that it is misleading to claim the adoption of a common bridging framework and it is misguided to struggle to achieve one. The differences will always make such an endeavour ‘a bridge too far’.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheila Ellwood & Sue Newbury, 2006. "A bridge too far: a common conceptual framework for commercial and public benefit entities," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 19-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:36:y:2006:i:1:p:19-32
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Likierman, 1998. "Resource Accounting and Budgeting—Where are we Now?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 17-20, April.
    2. James L. Chan, 2003. "Government Accounting: An Assessment of Theory, Purposes and Standards," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 13-20, January.
    3. WARREN McGREGOR, 1999. "The Pivotal Role Of Accounting Concepts In The Development Of Public Sector Accounting Standards," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 9(17), pages 3-8, March.
    4. Susan Newberry, 2001. "Public-Sector Accounting: A Common Reporting Framework?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 11(23), pages 2-7, March.
    5. Brian Booth, 2003. "The Conceptual Framework as a Coherent System for the Development of Accounting Standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 39(3), pages 310-324, October.
    6. Graeme W. Dean & Frank L. Clarke, 2003. "An Evolving Conceptual Framework?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 39(3), pages 279-297, October.
    7. Rowan Jones, 1998. "The Conceptual Framework of Resource Accounting," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 11-16, April.
    8. David Heald & George Georgiou, 2000. "Consolidation principles and practices for the UK government sector," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 153-167.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anita Golovkova, 2020. "IFRS implementation in healthcare facilities in the United Kingdom: (un)intended effects [Implementace IFRS ve zdravotnických zařízeních ve Velké Británii - (ne)zamyšlené dopady]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(3-4), pages 53-70.
    2. Anita Golovkova, 2020. "IFRS implementation in healthcare facilities in the United Kingdom: (un)intended effects [Implementace IFRS ve zdravotnických zařízeních ve Velké Británii – (ne)zamyšlené dopady]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(3-4).
    3. Zubir Azhar & Ervina Alfan & Krishnen Kishan & Nurul Husna Assanah, 2022. "Accrual Accounting at Different Levels of the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 36-62, March.
    4. Ellwood, Sheila & Greenwood, Margaret, 2016. "Accounting for heritage assets: Does measuring economic value ‘kill the cat’?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-13.
    5. Ralph Kober & Janet Lee & Juliana Ng, 2013. "GAAP, GFS and AASB 1049: perceptions of public sector stakeholders," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(2), pages 471-496, June.
    6. Ralph Kober & Janet Lee & Juliana Ng, 2021. "Australian not‐for‐profit sector views on the conceptual framework, accounting standards and accounting information," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 1105-1138, March.
    7. Sheila Ellwood & Susan Newberry, 2016. "New development: The conceptual underpinnings of international public sector accounting," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 231-234, April.
    8. David Heald & Ron Hodges, 2018. "Accounting for government guarantees: perspectives on fiscal transparency from four modes of accounting," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(7), pages 782-804, November.
    9. Janet Mack & Gareth G. Morgan & Oonagh B. Breen & Carolyn J. Cordery, 2017. "Financial reporting by charities: a matched case study analysis from four countries," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 165-172, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Christensen, 2007. "What We Might Know (But Aren't Sure) About Public-Sector Accrual Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 51-65, March.
    2. Sheila Ellwood, 2003. "Bridging the GAAP across the UK public sector," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 105-121.
    3. Susan Newberry, 2004. "Trade in Services: Wider Implications for Accounting Standard-Setters and Accountants," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 14(33), pages 11-21, July.
    4. Hyndman, Noel & Liguori, Mariannunziata & Meyer, Renate E. & Polzer, Tobias & Rota, Silvia & Seiwald, Johann, 2014. "The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. A comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian experiences," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 388-408.
    5. Rowan Jones, 2003. "Measuring and Reporting The Nation's Finances: Statistics and Accounting," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 21-28, January.
    6. Alessandro Lombrano & Luca Zanin, 2013. "IPSAS and local government consolidated financial statements—proposal for a territorial consolidation method," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 429-436, November.
    7. Malcolm Abbott & Angela Tan†Kantor, 2018. "Fair Value Measurement and Mandated Accounting Changes: The Case of the Victorian Rail Track Corporation," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(2), pages 266-278, June.
    8. Ram Karan, 2003. "Selective Commercialisation of Public-Sector Accounting and its Consequences for Public Accountability," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(31), pages 15-25, November.
    9. El-Tawy, Nevine & Tollington, Tony, 2013. "Some thoughts on the recognition of assets, notably in respect of intangible assets," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 67-80.
    10. Allan D. Barton, 2002. "Public-Sector Accounting:A Common Reporting Framework? A Rejoinder," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 12(28), pages 41-49, November.
    11. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Joerg‐Markus Hitz & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2009. "Relevance of Academic Research and Researchers' Role in the IASB's Financial Reporting Standard Setting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(4), pages 455-492, December.
    12. José Ramón Sánchez-Serrano & David Alaminos & Francisco García-Lagos & Angela M. Callejón-Gil, 2020. "Predicting Audit Opinion in Consolidated Financial Statements with Artificial Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Zubir Azhar & Ervina Alfan & Krishnen Kishan & Nurul Husna Assanah, 2022. "Accrual Accounting at Different Levels of the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 36-62, March.
    14. Fatma Ben Slama, 2024. "International Public Sector Accounting Standards and Economic Growth: An International Study of IPSAS Adoption and Experience," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 23(3), pages 483-506, June.
    15. Steinar Sars Kvifte, 2008. "Revisiting the Concepts: Time to Challenge the Asset-Liability View," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(1), pages 81-92, March.
    16. Nicolae Marinescu, 2016. "Spillover Effects From Foreign Direct Investment To Local Smes. An Empirical Study," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    17. Susan Newberry, 2001. "Public-Sector Accounting: A Common Reporting Framework?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 11(23), pages 2-7, March.
    18. Antonella Paolini & Michela Soverchia, 2013. "Le universit? statali italiane verso la contabilit? economico-patrimoniale ed il controllo di gestione," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 77-98.
    19. Guido Modugno & Ferdinando Di Carlo & Manuela Lucchese & Tommaso Agasisti, 2021. "Grafting New Values into Public Institutions by Reforming the Accounting System: Lessons Learned from the Italian Higher Education System," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, July.
    20. David B. Sutton & Carolyn J. Cordery & Tony Zijl, 2015. "The Purpose of Financial Reporting: The Case for Coherence in the Conceptual Framework and Standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(1), pages 116-141, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:36:y:2006:i:1:p:19-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.