IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v27y1997i3p243-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lies, Damned Lies and More Statistics: The Neglected Issue of Multiplicity in Accounting Research

Author

Listed:
  • R. Murray Lindsay

Abstract

The problem of ‘multiplicity’ (and selection) is considered by many statisticians to be among the most difficult and important problems they face. It includes such areas as multiple tests, variable selection in regression analysis, subgroup analysis and data mining. It undermines statistical inference by inflating type I errors well above reported levels of significance. The basic issue confronting researchers is how to adjust inferences to allow for multiplicity, particularly in exploratory or model-building analyses where standard textbook probability calculations associated with estimation and hypothesis testing do not apply. Despite its importance, and unlike what occurs in other disciplines, the multiplicity problem receives little or no attention in accounting. This situation is of concern because survey results suggest that serious type I error inflation is a real possibility in management accounting. In attempting to remedy this situation, the paper adopts a classical statistical framework for the purpose of examining the key issues underlying the problem and to present some strategies for dealing with it. These strategies offer the researcher a reasoned approach that recognises the possibility that the observed results may be due to chance, as well as the possibility that they are real. The discussion also highlights the fact that the only way to deal with the issue of multiplicity successfully is to repeat results on new data.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Murray Lindsay, 1997. "Lies, Damned Lies and More Statistics: The Neglected Issue of Multiplicity in Accounting Research," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 243-258, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:27:y:1997:i:3:p:243-258
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.1997.9729548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.1997.9729548
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.1997.9729548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jae H. Kim & Kamran Ahmed & Philip Inyeob Ji, 2018. "Significance Testing in Accounting Research: A Critical Evaluation Based on Evidence," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(4), pages 524-546, December.
    2. Gray, Rob & Milne, Markus J., 2015. "It's not what you do, it's the way that you do it? Of method and madness," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 51-66.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:27:y:1997:i:3:p:243-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.