IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v49y2025i1p101-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do rating agencies impound workforce human capital information into default risk assessments?

Author

Listed:
  • Dafydd Mali
  • Hyoung-joo Lim

Abstract

No accounting policy exists to mandate that employee-level human capital (ELHC) must be included on Annual Reports. Because structured ELHC information is rare, the association between ELHC and credit ratings (risk) is not demonstrated in the extant literature. South Korea is a unique instance where ELHC information is included on Annual Reports as a rule. Using a sample of 9,273 Korean listed firm-year observations from 2011-2020, we demonstrate that employee tenure, a ELHC proxy, has a positive association with credit ratings. The results infer that credit rating agencies interpret that employee tenure improves a firm's potential to survive a business cycle. The study also demonstrates that continuous employment has a more positive effect on credit ratings for NonBig4 and smaller clients/firms, compared to Big4 and larger clients/firms. The study contributes to the literature by demonstrating that firms that retain employees are less likely to default, implying that if firms look after employees, there are economic advantages. From a policymaking perspective, the study demonstrates the information advantage of reporting non-financial ELHC information on Annual Reports, on a structured/numerical basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Dafydd Mali & Hyoung-joo Lim, 2025. "Do rating agencies impound workforce human capital information into default risk assessments?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 101-126, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:49:y:2025:i:1:p:101-126
    DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2023.2235873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01559982.2023.2235873
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01559982.2023.2235873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:49:y:2025:i:1:p:101-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.