Author
Listed:
- Seán O’Reilly
- Louise Gorman
- Ciarán Mac An Bhaird
- Niamh M. Brennan
Abstract
This research investigates accounting practitioners’ perceptions of the feasibility of implementing the EU Green Taxonomy (“the Taxonomy”) for Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) and assesses the reporting challenges, supports required and SME benefits from the provision of Taxonomy disclosures. We approach our study from the perspectives of institutional theory and legitimacy theory. We adopt a novel methodology to explore our research questions using two case studies to engage 192 SME accounting practitioners in completing a survey questionnaire. We differentiate respondents in terms of “performers” and “conformers”. Our findings suggest that accounting practitioners believe the Taxonomy requirements to be feasible. From a legitimacy theory perspective, the data suggests both symbolic and substantive actions may be taken in providing Taxonomy disclosures. We also find evidence to suggest that where implementation costs are substantial, accounting practitioners believe that SMEs will only align with the Taxonomy when coerced to do so, consistent with institutional theory. Our findings add to the growing literature on the Taxonomy by showing that the quality of disclosures is contingent on targeted provision of government funding and resources to SMEs and their accounting practitioners. HighlightsSurveyed SME accounting practitioners on the feasibility of the EU Green Taxonomy.Novel methodology using two case studies to engage SME accounting practitioners.SME Accounting practitioners believe the Taxonomy requirements to be feasible.Resource constraints may lead to meaningless disclosures and potential greenwashing.
Suggested Citation
Seán O’Reilly & Louise Gorman & Ciarán Mac An Bhaird & Niamh M. Brennan, 2024.
"Implementing the European Union Green Taxonomy: implications for small- and medium-sized enterprises,"
Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 401-426, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:accfor:v:48:y:2024:i:3:p:401-426
DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2023.2272394
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:48:y:2024:i:3:p:401-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.