IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v48y2024i2p251-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employees’ perception of management control systems as a threat: effects on deliberate ignorance and workplace deviance

Author

Listed:
  • Ernesto Lopez-Valeiras
  • Jacobo Gomez-Conde
  • David Naranjo-Gil
  • Ricardo Malagueño

Abstract

We examine the impact of employees’ perceptions of management control systems (MCS) as a threat on two forms of misconduct: deliberate ignorance and workplace deviance. Drawing on the theory of cognitive dissonance, we predict that a perceived threat is associated with a decrease in workplace deviance but may also trigger unintended consequences, such as deliberate ignorance. Hypotheses are tested using survey data from three large hospitals. Taken together, our results suggest that employees’ perceptions of MCS as a threat have (1) a negative curvilinear effect on workplace deviance and (2) a positive linear association with deliberate ignorance. Additionally, we find that the need for professional autonomy shapes the effect of employees’ perception of MCS as a threat on both forms of misconduct. Overall, by providing new empirical evidence on how employees perceive MCS and their (un)intended consequences, we add to the growing body of research on the effects of control systems on employees’ behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernesto Lopez-Valeiras & Jacobo Gomez-Conde & David Naranjo-Gil & Ricardo Malagueño, 2024. "Employees’ perception of management control systems as a threat: effects on deliberate ignorance and workplace deviance," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 251-278, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:48:y:2024:i:2:p:251-278
    DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2022.2140500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01559982.2022.2140500
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01559982.2022.2140500?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:48:y:2024:i:2:p:251-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.