Author
Listed:
- Colin Haslam
- Nick Tsitsianis
- Glen Lehman
- Tord Andersson
- John Malamatenios
Abstract
•Carbon emissions in the S&P500 for the period 2008 to 2014 have not been reduced.Fig. 1S&P 313 Business Models: Carbon Generating and Carbon dependent business models.Notes: the shares of carbon emissions are the average for all companies in these business models covering the period 2008–2014Source: AuthorsFig. 2S&P 313 Business Models: Carbon intensity and capital employed.Notes: the shares of carbon emissions are the average for all companies in these business models covering the period 2008–2014. Capital employed is: Short and Long-run debt plus total shareholder equity which is paid in capital, additional capital paid in and retained earnings reserves after adjustments for changes in comprehensive income.Source: AuthorsChart 1Trading price of carbon on European ETS.Source: MacDonald (2016)Chart 2CO2 emissions: China, US and European Union 1960–2014 (bill tons).Source: The World Bank (2018)Chart 3Energy and Digital Lifestyle Business Model: Market Value Index.Source: Thomson Reuters and Author datasets•Carbon intensive business models present a threat to financial stability from ‘stranded assets’ and ‘carbon bubbles’.•Financial institutions should migrate investment portfolios away from carbon intensive business models.•Carbon intensive business models are conjoined to less carbon intensive business models which generate substantial financial leverage.This article accounts for carbon emissions in the S&P 500 and explores the extent to which capital is at risk from decarbonising value chains. At a global level it is proving difficult to decouple carbon emissions from GDP growth. Top-down legal and regulatory arrangements envisaged by the Kyoto Protocol are practically redundant given inconsistent political commitment to mitigating global climate change and promoting sustainability. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and European Commission (EC) are promoting the role of financial markets and financial institutions as drivers of behavioural change mobilising capital allocations to decarbonise corporate activity.
Suggested Citation
Colin Haslam & Nick Tsitsianis & Glen Lehman & Tord Andersson & John Malamatenios, 2018.
"Accounting for decarbonisation and reducing capital at risk in the S&P500,"
Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 119-129, March.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:accfor:v:42:y:2018:i:1:p:119-129
DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2018.01.004
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:42:y:2018:i:1:p:119-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.