IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v38y2014i3p184-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the measurement of fair value: Implications for accounting earnings

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Fargher
  • John Ziyang Zhang

Abstract

With the FASB's issue of staff position papers in 2009 and the relaxation of how fair value standards are applied, there has been a change in the practice of how fair value is measured. Since the FASB staff position papers in 2009, fair value measurement by financial institutions has increasingly relied on managerial assumptions. This study examines the impact of this change on the quality of earnings. Consistent with attribute substitution theory that emphasises reliability over relevance, we find that an apparent increase in managerial discretion in fair value measurement is associated with a higher probability of earnings management and lower earnings informativeness. The results indicate that allowing more managerial discretion in fair value measurement adversely affected the quality of financial reporting. Our study highlights the issue of reliable measurement in the debate among academics and practitioners of increasing the use of fair value accounting.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Fargher & John Ziyang Zhang, 2014. "Changes in the measurement of fair value: Implications for accounting earnings," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 184-199, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:38:y:2014:i:3:p:184-199
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2014.06.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.accfor.2014.06.002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accfor.2014.06.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rute Gonçalves & Patrícia Lopes, 2015. "Value-Relevance of Biological Assets under IFRS," FEP Working Papers 556, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    2. Inês Pinto & Ana Isabel Morais, 2022. "Classification of Equity Instruments under IFRS 9: Determinants and Consequences," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(4), pages 411-426, December.
    3. Sikalidis, Alexandros & Bozos, Konstantinos & Voulgaris, Georgios, 2023. "Asymmetric effects of fair value adjustments on dividend policy," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Mirjana Hladika & Danimir Gulin & Ivana Bernat, 2021. "Revaluation as a Model of Subsequent Measurement of Property, Plant, and Equipment – Case of Croatia," Croatian Economic Survey, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb, vol. 23(1), pages 63-95, June.
    5. Lin Liao & Helen Kang & Richard D. Morris, 2021. "The value relevance of fair value and historical cost measurements during the financial crisis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2069-2107, April.
    6. Manel Jmal Derbel & Mohamed Ali Boujelbene, 2015. "La Conformite Comptabilite-Fiscalite Et La Gestion Des Resultats : Cas Des Entreprises Tunisiennes," Post-Print hal-01188533, HAL.
    7. Johannes Thesing & Patrick Velte, 2021. "Do fair value measurements affect accounting-based earnings quality? A literature review with a focus on corporate governance as moderator," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(7), pages 965-1004, September.
    8. Yurniwati, 2017. "The Influence of the Quality of an Audit to Relationship Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) And Relevance of Value Accounting Information, And Asymmetry of Information (Study on Companies in Indonesia)," GATR Journals gjbssr457, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    9. Liao, Lin & Yao, Daifei (Troy) & Kang, Helen & Morris, Richard D., 2020. "The impact of legal efficacy on value relevance of the three-level fair value measurement hierarchy," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    10. Yosr Hrichi & Feten Arfaoui, 2023. "Research and development capitalization, fair value, and earnings management: A study of French listed companies," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 22(3), pages 569-586, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:38:y:2014:i:3:p:184-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.