IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acceur/v8y2011i1p23-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Accounting Standardisation: Is Politics Back?

Author

Listed:
  • Alain Burlaud
  • Bernard Colasse

Abstract

In the absence of political legitimacy, international accounting standardisation is founded on procedural and substantial legitimacies, which have been challenged by the current financial crisis. This paper represents a critique of this built up legitimacy. It demonstrates in particular that whilst due process is admittedly a transparent procedure, it is one in which only those players with major financial and intellectual resources can participate. It also highlights the weakness of the theoretical foundation, in particular agency theory and the theory of efficient markets, on which the conceptual framework of the IASB rests. This critical study of the foundations of the legitimacy of the IASC/IASB enables us to understand the extent of recent political intervention in a field that had previously been abandoned. Whilst international accounting standards did not trigger the crisis, some observers have said that they accelerated and even amplified it, mainly as a result of their pro-cyclical nature. This explains why, in October 2008, the international standard-setter was suddenly called to order by the European Union who requested it to urgently amend its Standards IAS 39 ‘Financial Instruments’ and IFRS 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’. This intervention by a political organisation is all the more remarkable since international accounting standardisation seemed to have been definitively handed over to specialists from the IASC/IASB, a body which had declared itself to be the international standardiser. The crisis therefore strongly undermined the legitimacy of the international standardiser. This raises the question of whether we are about to witness the return of politics in a field, which is, in reality, highly political. This possible return is indicated not only by the pressures successfully exerted on the international standardisation body by the EU and the G8 but also the recommendations made to the IASC/IASB by the new G20 and the publication in France of reports of a political, highly critical nature, devoted to the recent evolution of accounting standardisation. In this paper, using a reflexive, critical approach, we question the legitimacy of the IASC/IASB with the aim of evaluating the extent of the political recommendations made to it. It is clear that the legitimacy of an accounting standardisation body is fundamental since it conditions the legitimacy of the standards it issues, accounting practice itself and in the end, the confidence of users in the financial statements of companies. But this legitimacy is not innate. It is not natural or pre-existing. As we shall see, it is constructed and managed. In the first section, we will examine, and try to specify, the foundations of the IASB. In the second section, we will demonstrate the fragility of these foundations, a fragility that existed before the crisis but which the latter exposed more clearly. Lastly, in the third section, we will attempt to see if recent interventions of political organisations in the international accounting standardisation process have challenged the international standardiser and if they herald the return of politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Alain Burlaud & Bernard Colasse, 2011. "International Accounting Standardisation: Is Politics Back?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 23-47, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:23-47
    DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2011.574412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17449480.2011.574412
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17449480.2011.574412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Camfferman, Kees & Zeff, Stephen A., 2007. "Financial Reporting and Global Capital Markets: A History of the International Accounting Standards Committee, 1973-2000," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199296293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbara Masiello & Nicola Moscariello & Pietro Fera, 2018. "Political Marketing Strategies to Foster the Sustainability of Private Transnational Organisations: The Case of the IASB," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Karen Handley & Elaine Evans & Sue Wright, 2020. "Understanding participation in accounting standard‐setting: the case of AASB ED 192 Revised Differential Reporting Framework," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 3621-3645, December.
    3. Samindi Ishara Hewa & Rajni Mala & Jinhua Chen, 2020. "IASB's independence in the due process: an examination of interest groups’ influence on the development of IFRS 9," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2585-2615, September.
    4. Kingston, Kylie L. & Furneaux, Craig & de Zwaan, Laura & Alderman, Lyn, 2023. "Avoiding the accountability ‘sham-ritual’: An agonistic approach to beneficiaries’ participation in evaluation within nonprofit organisations," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Warren, Rebecca, 2024. "Maintaining and extending hegemony: The politics of accounting standard setting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Bamber, Matthew & McMeeking, Kevin, 2016. "An examination of international accounting standard-setting due process and the implications for legitimacy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 59-73.
    7. Alain Burlaud, 2013. "Should Financial Statements Represent Fairly or be Relevant?," Working Papers halshs-00873959, HAL.
    8. David Alexander & Anne Le Manh-Béna & Olivier J. Ramond, 2013. "Can the conceptual framework be all things to all (wo)men?," Post-Print hal-00991959, HAL.
    9. Mario Abela & Araceli Mora, 2012. "Understanding the Consequences of Accounting Standards in Europe: The Role of EFRAG," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 147-170, December.
    10. Crawford, Louise, 2019. "Exploring the emancipatory dimensions of globalisation: The struggle over IFRS8 and country-by-country reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Cantero Gamito, Marta, 2023. "The influence of China in AI governance through standardisation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    12. Roland Königsgruber, 2013. "Expertise-based lobbying and accounting regulation," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(4), pages 1009-1025, November.
    13. Bailey, Wendy J. & Sawers, Kimberly M., 2018. "Moving toward a principle-based approach to U.S. accounting standard setting: A demand for procedural justice and accounting reform," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-13.
    14. Molina Sánchez, Horacio & Mora Enguídanos, Araceli, 2015. "Cambios conceptuales en la contabilidad de los arrendamientos: retos normativos y académicos," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 99-113.
    15. Raffaele Fiume & Tiziano Onesti & Valerio Pieri, 2013. "Dialogue with standard setters," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3-4), pages 169-189.
    16. Roland Königsgruber & Stefan Palan, 2015. "Earnings management and participation in accounting standard-setting," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(1), pages 31-52, March.
    17. Jarosław Pawłowski, 2018. "The Usefulness Of Financial Reporting For Financial Instruments In The Decision-Making Processes Of Individual Investors," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 7(4), pages 99-113.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muzanenhamo, Penelope & Power, Sean Bradley, 2024. "ChatGPT and accounting in African contexts: Amplifying epistemic injustice," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Robert K. Larson & Paul J. Herz, 2013. "A Multi-Issue/Multi-Period Analysis of the Geographic Diversity of IASB Comment Letter Participation," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 99-151, June.
    3. Molina Sánchez, Horacio & Bautista Mesa, Rafael, 2018. "La participación en el /Participation in the IASB Due Process," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 36, pages 429-458, Mayo.
    4. S. Susela Devi & R. Helen Samujh, 2015. "The Political Economy of Convergence: The Case of IFRS for SMEs," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 25(2), pages 124-138, June.
    5. Stephen A. Zeff & Christopher W. Nobes, 2010. "Commentary: Has Australia (or Any Other Jurisdiction) ‘Adopted’ IFRS?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(2), pages 178-184, June.
    6. Olivier E. Malay, 2021. "How to Articulate Beyond GDP and Businesses’ Social and Environmental Indicators?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Francesco De Luca & Jenice Prather-Kinsey, 2018. "Legitimacy theory may explain the failure of global adoption of IFRS: the case of Europe and the U.S," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(3), pages 501-534, September.
    8. Sikka, Prem, 2011. "Accounting for human rights: The challenge of globalization and foreign investment agreements," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(8), pages 811-827.
    9. Daniel Mügge & Bart Stellinga, 2015. "The unstable core of global finance: Contingent valuation and governance of international accounting standards," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 47-62, March.
    10. Stephen A. Zeff, 2013. "The objectives of financial reporting: a historical survey and analysis," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 262-327, August.
    11. Paola Ramassa & Alberto Quagli, 2024. "Interpreting IFRS: The Evolving Role of Agenda Decisions," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 60(2), pages 205-235, June.
    12. Botzem, Sebastian & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2008. "Transnational institution building as public-private interaction: the case of standard setting on the Internet and in corporate financial reporting," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 36535, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Christopher W. Nobes & Stephen A. Zeff, 2008. "Auditors' Affirmations of Compliance with IFRS around the World: An Exploratory Study," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 279-292, November.
    14. Jaroslav Wagner, 2011. "Měření výkonnosti - vývojové tendence 2. poloviny 20. století [Performance Measurement - Developing Tendencies of the Second Half of the 20th Century]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(6), pages 775-793.
    15. Georgiou, George, 2010. "The IASB standard-setting process: Participation and perceptions of financial statement users," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 103-118.
    16. Brian A. Rutherford, 2022. "Individuating Assets and Liabilities in Financial Accounting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(2), pages 233-261, June.
    17. Zhang, Ying & Andrew, Jane, 2014. "Financialisation and the Conceptual Framework," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 17-26.
    18. Olivier E. Malay, 2020. "How to articulate beyond GDP and businesses’ social and environmental indicators?," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2020014, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    19. Stephen A. Zeff & Vaughan S. Radcliffe, 2010. "The Ontario Securities Commission on Accounting and Auditing from the 1960s to 2008–Part 2: The First Four Chief Accountants, 1986–1996," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 97-138, June.
    20. Stephen A. Zeff & Vaughan Radcliffe & Sally Gunz, 2014. "Accounting and Auditing Activities of the Ontario Securities Commission, 1960s to 2008 Part 3: The Fifth Chief Accountant, 1996–2008," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 223-252, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:23-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAIE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.