IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acceur/v4y2007i1p79-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Differences between IFRS and Polish Accounting Regulations: Evidence from the Financial Statements of Listed Entities on the Warsaw Stock Exchange for the Calendar Years Ending 2001, 2003 and 2004

Author

Listed:
  • Danuta Krzywda
  • Marek Schroeder

Abstract

An analysis of the qualitative and quantitative data on the differences between Polish accounting regulations and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) reported by the preparers of the financial statements of a sample of listed entities on the Warsaw Stock Exchange for the years ending 31 December 2001, 2003 and 2004 revealed that owners' equity and post tax earnings calculated using Polish accounting regulations were materially understated in comparison with their IFRS equivalents. The book value of owners' equity for 2004 calculated using Polish accounting regulations was understated by an average of between 6 and 9% while post tax earnings for 2004 were understated by an average of 35%. The main reasons for the differences were that Polish accounting regulations do not allow regular revaluations of tangible fixed assets, require different accounting treatments of positive and negative goodwill on consolidation and allow in certain circumstances the exclusion of subsidiaries from full consolidation.

Suggested Citation

  • Danuta Krzywda & Marek Schroeder, 2007. "An Analysis of the Differences between IFRS and Polish Accounting Regulations: Evidence from the Financial Statements of Listed Entities on the Warsaw Stock Exchange for the Calendar Years Ending 2001," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 79-107, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:4:y:2007:i:1:p:79-107
    DOI: 10.1080/17449480701343060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17449480701343060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17449480701343060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2002. "Poland : Accounting and Auditing," World Bank Publications - Reports 14527, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adela Deaconu & Dan Dacian Cuzdriorean, 2016. "Accounting and the state in post-communist Romania," African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 59-93.
    2. Cuzdriorean Dan Dacian & Albu Catalin Nicolae & Albu Nadia, 2012. "The Relationship Between Accounting And Taxation - The Romanian Accounting Environment," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 894-900, July.
    3. Dobija, Dorota & Klimczak, Karol Marek, 2010. "Development of accounting in Poland: Market efficiency and the value relevance of reported earnings," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 356-374, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dobija, Dorota & Klimczak, Karol Marek, 2010. "Development of accounting in Poland: Market efficiency and the value relevance of reported earnings," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 356-374, September.
    2. Andra GAJEVSZKY, 2013. "The Timeliness Of Financial Reporting In The Context Of European Union’S Emerging Economies," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 73-82, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:4:y:2007:i:1:p:79-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAIE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.