IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acceur/v22y2025i1p103-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Double Materiality Disclosure as an Emerging Practice: The Assessment Process, Impacts, Risks, and Opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Voicu D. Dragomir
  • Mădălina Dumitru
  • Ionela Corina Chersan
  • Cătălina Gorgan
  • Mirela Păunescu

Abstract

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive 2022/2464 (CSRD) introduces the concept of double materiality in the preparation of sustainability reports in the European Union (EU) starting in 2024. Our research aim is to provide ex-ante empirical evidence on how large Romanian enterprises perform materiality assessment and disclose impacts, risks, and opportunities. Data are collected from 20 listed Romanian companies, using an inductive approach. Most companies report information on their materiality assessment process; direct, inside out, and positive impacts (and less financial materiality), environmental risks and opportunities, and social impacts. Companies engage mainly with stakeholders in the social realm and less with financial capital providers. The stakeholder engagement process is not continuous, relying predominantly on isolated events. Internal processes are implemented and overseen by dedicated governance structures. Further clarifications and stricter requirements on the implementation of the double materiality concept are needed for the effective application of the CSRD.

Suggested Citation

  • Voicu D. Dragomir & Mădălina Dumitru & Ionela Corina Chersan & Cătălina Gorgan & Mirela Păunescu, 2025. "Double Materiality Disclosure as an Emerging Practice: The Assessment Process, Impacts, Risks, and Opportunities," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 103-140, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:22:y:2025:i:1:p:103-140
    DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2024.2339264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17449480.2024.2339264
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17449480.2024.2339264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:22:y:2025:i:1:p:103-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAIE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.