IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acceur/v22y2025i1p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ‘Conventional Wisdom’ of Auditing: Can the Traditions of Auditing Rise to New Challenges?

Author

Listed:
  • W. Robert Knechel

Abstract

In this essay, I will discuss whether the conventional wisdom of auditing is well suited to address the most pressing challenges facing the audit profession. I argue that some of the classic foundations of auditing may need to be reconsidered and adapted if the profession is going to retain its role as a trusted third-party assurance provider. The specific issues considered in this essay include the role of university education for entering the profession, the nature of standardization in the audit process, the impact of auditor tenure on audit quality, the underlying difficulties of achieving independence, the nature of the expectation gap, and the appropriate role of audit regulation and enforcement. While not complete, I use these issues to offer some observations about how evolution in our thinking about these core concepts may be needed for business, markets and societies to continue to instill trust in the assurance we provide.

Suggested Citation

  • W. Robert Knechel, 2025. "The ‘Conventional Wisdom’ of Auditing: Can the Traditions of Auditing Rise to New Challenges?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:22:y:2025:i:1:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2024.2435376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17449480.2024.2435376
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17449480.2024.2435376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:22:y:2025:i:1:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAIE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.