IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acceur/v11y2014i1p5-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The International Accounting Standards Board and Evidence-Informed Standard-Setting

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Teixeira

Abstract

This commentary describes some of the steps that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is taking to develop its research programme and draw on the work and people in the broader research community. I think it is important that we move even further away from decision-making based on assertions to more evidence-informed standard-setting. However, such a move has risks, including potentially giving IASB members an unjustified sense that they have 'proof' that they are making the right decisions. The IASB is aware of those risks and the limitations in using the extant literature in standard-setting. The IASB is developing ways to reduce these risks and overcome these limitations. However, real progress also needs the accounting research community to make some changes, and they need to want to change.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Teixeira, 2014. "The International Accounting Standards Board and Evidence-Informed Standard-Setting," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 5-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:11:y:2014:i:1:p:5-12
    DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2014.900269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17449480.2014.900269
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17449480.2014.900269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Leuz, 2018. "Evidence-based policymaking: promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 582-608, July.
    2. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    3. Khadija S. Almaghrabi & Kwaku Opong & Ioannis Tsalavoutas, 2021. "Compliance with pension‐related mandatory disclosures and debt financing," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1-2), pages 148-184, January.
    4. Yonca Ertimur & Jennifer Francis & Amanda Gonzales & Katherine Schipper, 2020. "Financial Reporting for Pollution Reduction Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 6015-6041, December.
    5. Kris Hoang & Steven E. Salterio & Jim Sylph, 2018. "Barriers to Transferring Auditing Research to Standard Setters," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 427-452, September.
    6. Kim Mear & Michael Bradbury & Jill Hooks, 2021. "The ability of deferred tax to predict future tax," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 241-264, March.
    7. Michael E. Bradbury, 2020. "How the XRB Uses Research in Setting Accounting and Assurance Standards," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 30(4), pages 249-256, December.
    8. Salterio, Steven E. & Hoang, Kris & Luo, Yi, 2021. "Communication is a two-way street: Analyzing practices undertaken to systematically transfer audit research knowledge to policymakers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Koonce, Lisa & Mongold, Cassie & Quaid, Laura & White, Brian J., 2024. "Experimental research on standard-setting issues in financial reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    10. Francesco Mazzi & Paul André & Dionysia Dionysiou & Ioannis Tsalavoutas, 2017. "Compliance with goodwill-related mandatory disclosure requirements and the cost of equity capital," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 268-312, April.
    11. Andrew Higson & Rasha Kassem, 2016. "Accounting Research: Relevance Lost," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 59-76.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:11:y:2014:i:1:p:5-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAIE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.