IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouird/v6y2024i3p11-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intersectional digital inequality in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka ChoczyÅ„ska

    (AGH University of Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Indonesia is an emerging economy with a fast-growing digital sector. However, the development is not uniform across the country, with wide gaps related to regional differences and personal characteristics. This paper analyses the digital gap in Indonesia in the intersectional framework. I consider several metrics, such as the ratio of the population accessing the Internet, villages receiving mobile internet signal, and telecommunication expenditures. The study spans five years, from 2018 to 2022 (with some years missing for some of the variables). The data comes from BPS-Statistics Indonesia 2022 report "Telecommunication Statistics in Indonesia". I compute the Equality Ratios for one-dimensional and intersectional inequality as the value of the digitalisation metric for the most underprivileged group divided by the value for the most privileged group. Then, I assess the intersectional surplus as the difference between the inequality experienced by the intersectional group and the combination of one-dimensional inequalities. There is a substantial gap in internet usage and mobile internet availability in Indonesia, mostly related to urban/rural division and disparities between provinces. On the contrary, the gender gap is minimal. I also find no inequality in telecommunication expenditures. The gaps in internet usage were converging in recent years, but this was not true for the gaps in internet availability. People in intersectional groups face the combination of one-dimensional inequalities, but in most cases, there are none or minimal surplus effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka ChoczyÅ„ska, 2024. "Intersectional digital inequality in Indonesia," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 11-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouird:v:6:y:2024:i:3:p:11-22
    DOI: 10.70132/a2853658265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/ird/uploads/articles/23/Choczynska_Intersectional_digital_inequality_in_Indonesia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/ird/article/167
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.70132/a2853658265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sujarwoto, Sujarwoto & Tampubolon, Gindo, 2016. "Spatial inequality and the Internet divide in Indonesia 2010–2012," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 602-616.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anushka Verma & Arun K. Giri & Byomakesh Debata, 2023. "Does ICT diffusion reduce poverty? Evidence from SAARC countries," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 8-28, March.
    2. Adam Sadowski & Karolina Lewandowska-Gwarda & Renata Pisarek-Bartoszewska & Per Engelseth, 2021. "A longitudinal study of e-commerce diversity in Europe," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 169-194, March.
    3. Long Yang & Haiyang Lu & Sangui Wang & Meng Li, 2021. "Mobile Internet Use and Multidimensional Poverty: Evidence from A Household Survey in Rural China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 1065-1086, December.
    4. Asongu, Simplice A. & Odhiambo, Nicholas M., 2019. "Governance and social media in African countries: An empirical investigation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 411-425.
    5. Gindo Tampubolan & Maria Fajarini, 2017. "A double-edged sword: technology, prosperity and inequality," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 142017, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    6. Myovella, Godwin & Karacuka, Mehmet & Haucap, Justus, 2021. "Determinants of digitalization and digital divide in Sub-Saharan African economies: A spatial Durbin analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10).
    7. Martínez-Domínguez, Marlen & Mora-Rivera, Jorge, 2020. "Internet adoption and usage patterns in rural Mexico," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    8. Mora-Rivera, Jorge & García-Mora, Fernando, 2021. "Internet access and poverty reduction: Evidence from rural and urban Mexico," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2).
    9. Ariansyah, Kasmad & Sirait, Emyana Ruth Eritha & Nugroho, Badar Agung & Suryanegara, Muhammad, 2021. "Drivers of and barriers to e-commerce adoption in Indonesia: Individuals’ perspectives and the implications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8).
    10. Martínez-Domínguez, Marlen & Fierros-González, Isael, 2022. "Determinants of internet use by school-age children: The challenges for Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1).
    11. Fennell, Shailaja & Kaur, Prabhjot & Jhunjhunwala, Ashok & Narayanan, Deapika & Loyola, Charles & Bedi, Jaskiran & Singh, Yaadveer, 2018. "Examining linkages between Smart Villages and Smart Cities: Learning from rural youth accessing the internet in India," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 810-823.
    12. Ali, Mohammad Afshar & Alam, Khorshed & Taylor, Brad, 2020. "Measuring the concentration of information and communication technology infrastructure in Australia: Do affordability and remoteness matter?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Dzator, Janet & Acheampong, Alex O. & Appiah-Otoo, Isaac & Dzator, Michael, 2023. "Leveraging digital technology for development: Does ICT contribute to poverty reduction?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digitalisation; digital divide; intersectional inequality; Indonesia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • O53 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Asia including Middle East

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouird:v:6:y:2024:i:3:p:11-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.