IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouird/v1y2019i1p48-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The classification and comparison of business ratios analysis methods

Author

Listed:
  • Sergejs Hilkevics

    (Ventspils University College, Latvia)

  • Valentina Semakina

    (Ventspils University College, Latvia)

Abstract

There are many business ratios analysis methods, which are used for different purposes, and the task of these methods classification remains actual business administration problem at present time. In this paper, we suggest two-dimensional classification for business ratios analysis methods. The first dimension is related to the goal of analysis – who and what for performs the business ratios analysis. Usually different real or possible participants of business process perform business ratios analysis for decision-making. There are four main real participants of the business process – owners, workers, managers, society, and two potential participants – creditors and investors. Interests of all participants of the business process are different and therefore the purposes of business ratios analysis can be different. The difference in purposes entails the difference of methods of business ratios analysis, but the common question for all participants of business processes is the question about how their interests are satisfied. The second suggested dimension for business ratios analysis methods classification is the depth of analysis and four levels of analysis are suggested here. The first level is the level of operations and such ratios as earnings (EBITDA, EBIT, EBT, EAT, RE), returns (ROI, ROA, ROE), assets (FA, CA, OF, LTL, CL, TA) are considered at this level. The second level is the financial leverage level and such ratios as Debt/Equity, Interest, Tax, ROE are considered at this level. The third level is the stock market level and such ratios as NPV, EVA, NOPAT, WACC are considered here. The fourth level of business ratios analysis is the functional level or the level of structural units. Independently on the interests of participants of business process, a company should perform such business functions as the creation of organizational structure, financial, human and material resources management, main business activity organization, marketing and others. Usually, special structural units are created in the company to perform most significant business functions, and the quantitative evaluation of business functions performance needs to consider business ratios, which describing appropriate units. Therefore, there are many business ratios analysis methods. The classification and comparison of them give the possibility to take into account, compare the interests of all participants of the business process, and find more qualitative business solutions. Paper considers the classification of business ratios analysis methods and compares them to work out recommendations to balance the interests of different business process participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergejs Hilkevics & Valentina Semakina, 2019. "The classification and comparison of business ratios analysis methods," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 1(1), pages 48-57, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouird:v:1:y:2019:i:1:p:48-57
    DOI: 10.9770/ird.2019.1.1(4)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/ird/uploads/articles/1/Hilkevics_The_classification_and_comparison_of_business_ratios_analysis_methods.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/ird/article/5
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/ird.2019.1.1(4)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rasa Subačienė & Lehte Alver & Inta Brūna & Mirjana Hladika & Daša Mokošová & Jan Molín, 2018. "Evaluation of accounting regulation evolution in selected countries," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(1), pages 139-175, September.
    2. Svetlana Vegera & Alena Malei & Renata Trubovich, 2018. "Accounting development of natural resources in organizations carrying out the disposal of municipal waste and biogas extraction in the context of the "green" economy," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(1), pages 211-225, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarína Havierniková & Marcel Kordoš, 2019. "Selected risks perceived by SMEs related to sustainable entrepreneurship in case of engagement into cluster cooperation," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 1680-1693, June.
    2. Zainizam Zakariya & Kristinn Hermanssons & Kho Yin Yin & Noor Fazlin Mohamed Noor, 2019. "Regional Economic Growth in Malaysia: Does Aggregate Overqualification Matter?," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(5), pages 139-156, December.
    3. Anis Ali, 2020. "Financial performance, disparity, and trend of petrochemicals sector of Saudi Arabia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(1), pages 809-824, September.
    4. Ainur Karipova & Gulmira Kabdullina & Gizat Kenesheva & Madina Tursumbaeva & Saltanat Kapysheva & Zhanna Nurgalieva, 2020. "Monitoring of industrial enterprises' performance in emerging economy: a case study," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 1177-1196, December.
    5. Aleksandra Leschinskaya & Oksana Kirillova & Maksim Palyanov, 2023. "Assessment of the Formation of the Economic Effect of Cross-Subsidization in the Electric Power Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Jolanta Sabaitytė & Vida Davidavičienė & Gerard Frederick Van Kleef, 2020. "The Peculiarities of Low-Cost Carrier Development in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Natalya Pavlovna Vinogradova & Alexander Nikolaevich Popov, 2019. "Methodological basis of economic decision-making," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 1798-1806, June.
    8. Natalia A. Prodanova & Natalia V. Savina & Vadim A. Dikikh & Yulianna I. Enina & Olga Yurievna Voronkova & Vladimir V. Nosov & Vladimir V. Nosov, 2020. "Features of the coherent presentation of information in order to prepare integrated corporate reporting," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 2227-2281, March.
    9. Natalia A. Prodanova & Natalia V. Savina & Zhanna Kevorkova & Lyudmila N. Korshunova & Nadezhda Bochkareva, 2019. "Organizational and methodological support of corporate self-assessment procedure as a basis for sustainable business development," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1136-1148, December.
    10. Larysa Cherchyk & Mykola Shershun & Nina Khumarova & Taras Mykytyn & Artur Cherchyk, 2019. "Assessment of forest enterprises' performance: integrating economic security and ecological impact," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 1784-1797, June.
    11. Aksana A. Turgaeva & Liudmila V. Kashirskaya & Yulia A. Zurnadzhyants & Olga A. Latysheva & Irina V. Pustokhina & Andrei V. Sevbitov, 2020. "Assessment of the financial security of insurance companies in the organization of internal control," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 2243-2254, March.
    12. Liudmila V. Kashirskaya & Alexey A. Sitnov & Dilmurod Аsh. Davlatzoda & Tatiana M. Vorozheykina, 2020. "Knowledge audit as a key tool for business research in the information society," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 2299-2319, March.
    13. Olga Lingaitienė & Juozas Merkevičius & Vida Davidavičienė, 2021. "The Model of Vehicle and Route Selection for Energy Saving," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Aleksandr M. Batkovskiy & Aleksandr V. Leonov & Aleksey Yu. Pronin & Elena G. Semenova & Alena V. Fomina & Viktor M. Balashov, 2019. "Sustainable development of Industry 4.0: the case of high-tech products system design," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 1823-1838, June.
    15. Karine Alexandrovna Barmuta & Vadim Vitalievich Ponkratov & Maksim Maramygin & Nikolay Vladimirovich Kuznetsov & Vitali Ivlev & Marina I. Ivleva, 2019. "Mathematical model of optimizing the balance sheet structure of the Russian banking system with allowance for the foreign exchange risk levels," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 484-497, September.
    16. Nazym Bozgulova & Rimma Parmanova & Maira Abenova & Tatyana Ivanyuk & Vassiliy Aryshev, 2019. "Calculation methods for cost management in the construction industry," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1450-1461, December.
    17. Daiva Tamulevičienė & Armenia Androniceanu & Armenia Androniceanu, 2020. "Selection of the indicators to measure an enterprise’s value and its changes in the controlling system for medium-sized enterprises," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 1440-1458, March.
    18. Andrey Leonidovich Poltarykhin & Valentina N. Ivanova & Andrzej Szromnik, 2020. "Sustainable functioning of educational institutions based on the risk-management implementation mechanism," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(1), pages 390-397, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ssi:jouesi:v:1:y:2019:i:1:p:48-57 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Sergejs Hilkevics & Valentina Semakina, 2019. "The classification and comparison of business ratios analysis methods," Post-Print hal-02115236, HAL.
    3. Anh Ngoc Mai & Huong Van Vu & Bien Xuan Bui & Tuyen Quang Tran, 2019. "The lasting effects of innovation on firm profitability: panel evidence from a transitional economy," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 3417-3436, January.
    4. Arumega Zarefar & Dian Agustia & Noorlailie Soewarno, 2022. "Bridging the Gap between Sustainability Disclosure and Firm Performance in Indonesian Firms: The Moderating Effect of the Family Firm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Viktoriya Valeryevna Manuylenko & Marina Aleksandrovna Loktionova & Nina Vladimirovna Lipchiu & Natalia Vladimirovna Sobchenko & Tatyana Andreyevna Sadovskaya, 2018. "Options simulation toolkit for strategic evaluation of corporations' financial potential," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 871-889, December.
    6. Edmunds Čižo & Olga Lavrinenko & Svetlana Ignatjeva, 2020. "Determinants of financial development of the EU countries in the period 1995-2017," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(2), pages 505-522, June.
    7. Edmunds Čižo & Olga Lavrinenko & Svetlana Ignatjeva, 2020. "Determinants of financial development of the EU countries in the period 1995-2017," Post-Print hal-02919508, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    business ratios; participants of the business process; company efficiency;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouird:v:1:y:2019:i:1:p:48-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.