IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v8y2021i3p633-653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards more sustainable dispute resolution in courts: empirical study on challenges of the court-connected mediation in Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Agnė Tvaronavičienė

    (Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania)

  • Natalija Kaminskienė

    (Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania)

  • Irena Žemaitaitytė

    (Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania)

  • Maria Cudowska

    (University of Bialystok, Poland)

Abstract

Court-connected mediation designed to foster more sustainable dispute resolution practices in Lithuania was launched in 2005. The article is an elaboration on Lithuania’s experiences relating to court-connected mediation in the realm of civil justice. It investigates the problem of the so called “plateau”, when the number of mediated cases stops to grow, thus raising the question of what is the future of court-connected mediation in general. Authors present the main features of the Lithuanian court-connected mediation model and stages of its formation. The autors strive to provide a better understanding of the possible causes for the problem under consideration, as well as underlying assumptions associated with sustainable dispute resolution practices in courts. Next, the results of the original quantitative and qualitative empirical survey dedicated to the analyzed problem and performed by the authors in the beginning of 2021 are presented. The research is supplemented by data from Poland, which presents a fracture of the problems related to court-connected mediation in Eastern Europe. Poland’s perspective provides a glance into another legal system, which chose a different model of court-connected mediation without the direct involvement of judges as mediators. Still, the data from Poland shows the tendency of a steady influx of mediated cases. The article ends with a discussion, conclussions and recommendations on the causes and consequences of mediation stagnation in the process of developing a court-mediation and, possibly, mediation in general. The paper is dedicated to dispute resolution experts, both practitioners and scientists, who are interested in Eastern European experiences and problems associated with the development of mediatiaton.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnė Tvaronavičienė & Natalija Kaminskienė & Irena Žemaitaitytė & Maria Cudowska, 2021. "Towards more sustainable dispute resolution in courts: empirical study on challenges of the court-connected mediation in Lithuania," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 633-653, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:633-653
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2021.8.3(40)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/31/Tvaronaviciene_Towards_more_sustainable_dispute_resolution_in_courts_empirical_study_on_challenges_of_the_courtconnected_mediation_in_Lithuania.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/804
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2021.8.3(40)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    court-connected mediation; judge as a mediator; dispute resolution; mediation plateau; stagnation; empirical research;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K15 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Civil Law; Common Law
    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:633-653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.