IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v6y2018i2p890-911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of spatial development on sustainable entrepreneurship

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Petrovna Kiselitsa

    (Tyumen State University, Russian Federation)

  • Natalia Nikolaevna Shilova

    (Tyumen Industrial University, Russian Federation)

  • Irina Aleksandrovna Liman

    (Tyumen State University, Russian Federation)

  • Egor Evgenyevich Naumenko

    (Tyumen State University, Russian Federation)

Abstract

The article considers the factors that impede the sustainable development of entrepreneurship. The results of the studies are presented that prove that spatial development based on the growth of agglomerative formations with time can start to hamper the innovative development of entrepreneurship in the regions. The change of the consolidated innovation index is studied depending on the size of the agglomeration zone and the scope of works in terms of the number of city inhabitants. The reasons limiting prospects of the agglomeration growth of large formations, in particular, the mass outflow of the population to large cities and low natural growth of the population, are researched. The compensatory possibilities of migratory flows have been studied and the expediency of ensuring sustainable entrepreneurship based on the new scheme of spatial development of Russia on the basis of agglomeration transformations, and primarily the formation of non-urban agglomerations, has been proved.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Petrovna Kiselitsa & Natalia Nikolaevna Shilova & Irina Aleksandrovna Liman & Egor Evgenyevich Naumenko, 2018. "Impact of spatial development on sustainable entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 890-911, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:890-911
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(28)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/22/Kiselitsa_Impact_of_spatial_development_on_sustainable_entrepreneurship.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/259
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(28)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald H. Coase, 2008. "The Institutional Structure of Production," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 2, pages 31-39, Springer.
    2. Andrey S. Mikhaylov, 2018. "Socio-spatial dynamics, networks and modelling of regional milieu," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(4), pages 1020-1030, June.
    3. Fagerberg, Jan & Srholec, Martin, 2008. "National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1417-1435, October.
    4. Andrey S. Mikhaylov, 2018. "Socio-spatial dynamics, networks and modelling of regional milieu," Post-Print hal-01860131, HAL.
    5. Leontief, Wassily, 1977. "The future of the world economy+," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 171-182.
    6. Edward L. Glaeser, 2005. "Reinventing Boston: 1630--2003," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 119-153, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Alberto Martínez-González & Urszula Kobylinska & Desiderio Gutiérrez-Taño, 2021. "Exploring Personal and Contextual Variables of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor through the Rasch Mathematical Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. José Alberto Martínez-González & Urszula Kobylinska & Francisco J. García-Rodríguez & Lukasz Nazarko, 2019. "Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Intention among Young People: Model and Regional Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Keti Lelo & Salvatore Monni & Federico Tomassi, 2018. "Urban inequalities in Italy: a comparison between Rome, Milan and Naples," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 939-957, December.
    4. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asef Karimi & Haniye Rezaei & Morteza Akbari & Pantea Foroudi, 2021. "The concept of innovation network: an application of the meta-synthesis approach," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 11(1), pages 399-419, December.
    2. Ron Boschma, 2018. "The geographical dimension of structural change," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1839, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2018.
    3. Viacheslav B. Dziundziuk & Oleksandr A. Kotukov & Dmytro V. Hryn & Eugene V. Kotukh, 2020. "Spread of virtual communities as a potential threat to state security and sustainable well-being," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2 suppl.), pages 7-18.
    4. Heng Cui & Hanzhen Fang & Yiyuan Tian & Wenlong Zheng & Wenzhuo Li & Wengao Tian, 2022. "Evaluation of Livability of Wuhan under Ecological Construction and Analysis of Its Spatial Pattern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Keti Lelo & Salvatore Monni & Federico Tomassi, 2018. "Urban inequalities in Italy: a comparison between Rome, Milan and Naples," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 939-957, December.
    6. Jan Fagerberg & Martin Srholec, 2017. "Global Dynamics, Capabilities and the Crisis," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Uwe Cantner (ed.), Foundations of Economic Change, pages 83-106, Springer.
    7. Schmid, Andreas, 2007. "Incentive Compatibility and Efficiency in the contractual Insurer-Provider Relationship: Economic Theory and practical Implications: The Case of North Carolina," MPRA Paper 23311, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    8. Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2008. "The consequences of voluntary traceability system for supply chain relationships. An application of transaction cost economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 560-569, December.
    9. Wiser, R. H., 2000. "The role of public policy in emerging green power markets: an analysis of marketer preferences," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 177-212, June.
    10. Kim, Jinhee & Lee, Keun, 2022. "Local–global interface as a key factor in the catching up of regional innovation systems: Fast versus slow catching up among Taipei, Shenzhen, and Penang in Asia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2007:i:68:p:1-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ludwig van den Hauwe, 2005. "Public Choice, Constitutional Political Economy and Law and Economics," Method and Hist of Econ Thought 0508001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 09 Aug 2005.
    13. Biondi Yuri, 2017. "The Firm as an Enterprise Entity and the Tax Avoidance Conundrum: Perspectives from Accounting Theory and Policy," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, April.
    14. Machiko Nissanke, 2015. "A Quest for Institutional Foundations Towards Inclusive Development in Sub-Saharan Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2015-049, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Amar Gande & Kose John & Vinay B. Nair & Lemma W. Senbet, 2020. "Taxes, institutions, and innovation: Theory and international evidence," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1413-1442, December.
    16. Faye Duchin & Stephen Levine, 2012. "The rectangular sector-by-technology model: not every economy produces every product and some products may rely on several technologies simultaneously," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 1(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Ron Boschma & Ron Martin, 2010. "The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Ilona Baumane & Rebekka Vedina, 2011. "Capacities and Competencies as Sources of Competitive Advantage: The Case Study of Latvian Hotels," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(2), pages 301-318, May.
    19. Uyar, Ali & Bani-Mustafa, Ahmed & Nimer, Khalil & Schneider, Friedrich & Hasnaoui, Amir, 2021. "Does innovation capacity reduce tax evasion? Moderating effect of intellectual property rights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    20. Jan Fagerberg & Maryann Feldman & Martin Srholec, 2011. "Technological Dynamics and Social Capability: Comparing U.S. States and European Nations," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20111114, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    21. Robert Ayres, 1995. "Thermodynamics and process analysis for future economic scenarios," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(3), pages 207-230, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sustainable entrepreneurship; nonurban agglomerations; rural agglomerations; agglomerative transformations; spatial development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:890-911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.