Author
Listed:
- Olga Lavrinenko
(Daugavpils University, Latvia)
- Svetlana Ignatjeva
(Daugavpils University, Latvia)
- Alina Danileviča
(Daugavpils University, Latvia)
- Vera Komarova
(Daugavpils University, Latvia)
- Stanislav Vaisla
(Daugavpils University, Latvia)
Abstract
The article examines the complex relationship between institutions and economic performance in the EU. Institutions' quality will be measured by corruption (measured by the Corruption Perceptions Index) and so-called "state fragility" (measured by the Fragile States Index); economic performance will be measured by GDP per capita in PPP. Using hierarchical cluster analysis, the study classifies the EU countries into two groups: (1) countries with high corruption, low quality of public institutions and low economic performance, and (2) countries with low corruption, strong public institutions and high economic performance. This method reveals differences in the impact of corruption and fragile states on economic performance, making the analysis more comprehensive than linear regression models. The study results show that in countries with high corruption and low quality of public institutions, economic performance is significantly lower, and corruption has a more significant negative impact on the economy. At the same time, in the more developed countries, where corruption is low, economic performance is related to the Fragile States Index. These differences underscore that in less developed countries, the fight against corruption should be a key priority, while in more developed countries, the focus should be on strengthening public institutions to sustain high economic performance. The results of the study have important foresight conclusions. In countries with high corruption and low level of quality of public institutions, without decisive measures to address them, economic performance could be expected to continue to decrease, leading to greater economic and social imbalances. For countries with high economic performance and strong public institutions, the emphasis on institution-building will contribute to more sustainable economic performance in the long term. It is expected that countries that effectively combat corruption and strengthen their public institutions will be able to improve economic performance, attract more investment and increase global competitiveness. The study provides a new perspective on the relationship between corruption, fragile states and economic performance, for the first time classifying the EU countries on the basis of these indicators. The results of the study point to the need to develop adapted policies aimed at strengthening public institutions and reducing corruption, which are important for sustaining and increasing economic performance in different groups of the EU countries.
Suggested Citation
Olga Lavrinenko & Svetlana Ignatjeva & Alina Danileviča & Vera Komarova & Stanislav Vaisla, 2025.
"Institutions’ quality and economic performance in the EU: insights from a cluster analysis,"
Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 12(3), pages 88-101, March.
Handle:
RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:12:y:2025:i:3:p:88-101
DOI: 10.9770/f6735475773
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
institutions;
corruption;
fragile states;
economic performance;
interconnection;
cluster analysis;
EU countries;
All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- B22 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Macroeconomics
- E02 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Institutions and the Macroeconomy
- O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
- O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
- O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:12:y:2025:i:3:p:88-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.