IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jemt00/v8y2017i3p629-641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Willingness to Pay for Good Agricultural Practice Cabbage

Author

Listed:
  • Kanokwan CHANCHAROENCHAI

    (Department of Economics Faculty of Economics Kasetsart University Bangkok Thailand)

  • Wuthiya SARAITHONG

    (Department of Economics Faculty of Economics Kasetsart University Bangkok Thailand)

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate factors determining the probability of consumers willingness to pay a premium price for safe cabbage as well as to estimate the mean willingness to pay a premium price for safe cabbage of consumers Interviews with survey questionnaire are conducted in Bangkok with 540 respondents The contingent valuation method with single and double bounded models is employed The coefficients used to calculate mean willingness to pay are estimated by Maximum Likelihood method The estimation of the change in the probability of people willing to pay for standardized cabbage is assessed by marginal effects of each factor which are calculated by probit model The result finds 9 significant variables as the determinants of consumers willingness to pay 329 respondents express their willingness to pay for GAP cabbage while 143 respondents show their true zero bids The estimation of mean willingness to pay therefore is done based on these two groups of respondents The weighted mean willingness to pay for GAP cabbage is 3 54 baht kilogram over the current market price of normal cabbage This amount is much lower than the difference in the variable cost between non GAP and GAP cabbage producers making it difficult for farmers to turn to standardized process of production

Suggested Citation

  • Kanokwan CHANCHAROENCHAI & Wuthiya SARAITHONG, 2017. "Assessment of Willingness to Pay for Good Agricultural Practice Cabbage," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(3), pages 629-641.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jemt00:v:8:y:2017:i:3:p:629-641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jemt00:v:8:y:2017:i:3:p:629-641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.