Author
Listed:
- Saule BISHIMBAYEVA
(Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Astana Kazakhstan)
- Kulyanda NURASHEVA
(School of Business and Commercialization M Auezov South Kazakhstan State University Shymkent Kazakhstan)
- Aigul NURMUKHANBETOVA
(Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University Astana Kazakhstan)
Abstract
The goal of the study is to demonstrate that the Triple Helix model neither sufficiently reflects the process of innovation development nor justifies the fourth helix the indicators of which describe the real situation in the social and economic area of the country and are an important element of the innovation ecosystem The study uses empirical methods observation measurement description of facts logical inferences sampling of the required information its grouping system and statistical analysis and comparison of the indicators under study The analysis of the existing models of innovation development and their applicability in Kazakhstan practice has been carried out Considering the Triple Helix concept of innovation development a proposal is made to introduce a fourth player the civil society which ensures the influence and voice of the people and serves as a channel of communication with the authorities The solution of the innovation problem presented in the article is of interest to the post Soviet countries and emerging economies where social issues and the welfare of citizens have not received sufficient attention but the components of the Triple Helix government universities and business do not work without their solution The distinction of the study lies in the development of a model of the fourth helix of innovation development which reflects the state of the civil society and socioeconomic processes in the country
Suggested Citation
Saule BISHIMBAYEVA & Kulyanda NURASHEVA & Aigul NURMUKHANBETOVA, 2017.
"Models of Innovation Development Measurement Indicators and their Interaction a Case Study of Kazakhstan,"
Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(8), pages 2361-2372.
Handle:
RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:8:p:2361-2372
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:8:p:2361-2372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.