IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/src/sbseec/v4y2022i1p115-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflict Management, Effect of Gender in Different Enterprises: Empirical Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Shaikh, Sundus

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to study past researches and articles by examining the main and interactive effects of gender on conflict-management style and strategies in different organizational setups or industry nature.Approach: This research was designed to investigate assumptions that may exist regarding the relationship between gender and conflict resolution style in different setups. Review-based Qualitative content analysis method was used in this study to analyze the past and contemporary studies on the influence of gender in conflict resolution.Findings: The results found that biological sex does not correlate with the choice of conflict management style. On the other hand, the findings have shown that gender role is a forecaster for the choice of conflict management styles as masculine and androgynous individuals were highest on the dominating conflict style and avoiding style depending on the conflict, whereas feminine individuals were highest on the avoiding style and collaborative conflict resolution style.Implications: A model has been developed based on the literature review identifying the key types of functional conflicts resolution ways and to promote or diminish organizational conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaikh, Sundus, 2022. "Conflict Management, Effect of Gender in Different Enterprises: Empirical Literature Review," Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies, CSRC Publishing, Center for Sustainability Research and Consultancy Pakistan, vol. 4(1), pages 115-126, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:src:sbseec:v:4:y:2022:i:1:p:115-126
    DOI: http://doi.org/10.26710/sbsee.v4i1.2576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publishing.globalcsrc.org/ojs/index.php/sbsee/article/view/2576/1541
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://doi.org/10.26710/sbsee.v4i1.2576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:src:sbseec:v:4:y:2022:i:1:p:115-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr Rana Muhammad Adeel Farooq (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrcmpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.