IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/apfiba/v6y2016i4f6_4_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency of the Brazilian Banking System: An Assessment Using DEA under Three Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Adriel Martins de Freitas Branco
  • Alexandre Pereira Salgado Junior
  • Patrícia Benites Cava
  • Murilo Carneiro

Abstract

This study has used the DEA-BCC (VRS) technique to assess the efficiency of Brazilian banks in the year of 2013 under three most used approaches. Then the differences of the results of each classification were evaluated according to the Mann-Whitney's test. The efficiency scores were assessed according to 1) capital origin, 2) bank size, 3) market niche, and 4) rating. The study demonstrates that public banks are more efficient and that bank size is relevant for production approach, but without impacting profitability and intermediation as bank market niche is a more relevant feature for explaining bank efficiency. Was observed that bank ratings can discriminate all the approaches based on the highest scale (AAA), highlighting the profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriel Martins de Freitas Branco & Alexandre Pereira Salgado Junior & Patrícia Benites Cava & Murilo Carneiro, 2016. "Efficiency of the Brazilian Banking System: An Assessment Using DEA under Three Approaches," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 1-3.
    • Handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:6:y:2016:i:4:f:6_4_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB%2fVol%206_4_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Li & Yung-ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin & Yun Yuan Huang, 2019. "Market share and performance in Taiwanese banks: min/max SBM DEA," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(2), pages 233-252, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:6:y:2016:i:4:f:6_4_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.