IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/admaec/v4y2014i3f4_3_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Assessment of Measuring the Extent of Implementing Responsibility Accounting Rudiments in Jordanian Industrial Companies listed at Amman Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad EbrahimNawaiseh
  • Abdul-rahman Zeidan
  • Mahmoud Falahat
  • Atala Qtish

Abstract

Aims: To identify what extent the Jordanian Industrial Companiesfully implement responsibility accounting? To disclose the obstacles that may abstain of full implementation of responsibility accounting rudiments. Study Design: Research paper. Place and Duration of Study: Jordan. Questionnaire in 2013. Methodology: (45) public shareholding industrial companies in Jordan out of (80) in 2013, the final respondents that are subjected to analysis (37) which constitute (46.25%) frompopulation, (82.22%) from the sample size. Results: The study concluded a set of results: There is partially implementation of responsibility accounting with a percentage of (67.18%), obstacles percentage that ofimplementation is (74.33%). A set of recommendations were proposed for boosting the degree of enhancement of responsibility accounting.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad EbrahimNawaiseh & Abdul-rahman Zeidan & Mahmoud Falahat & Atala Qtish, 2014. "An Empirical Assessment of Measuring the Extent of Implementing Responsibility Accounting Rudiments in Jordanian Industrial Companies listed at Amman Stock Exchange," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 1-9.
    • Handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:4:y:2014:i:3:f:4_3_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/AMAE%2fVol%204_3_9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philip Owino & John C. Munene & Joseph M. Ntayi, 2016. "Does responsibility accounting in public universities matter?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1254838-125, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:4:y:2014:i:3:f:4_3_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.