IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v94y2014i4p239-257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vor der Europawahl: Wie lässt sich die demokratische Legitimität verbessern?

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Kotzur
  • Andreas Grimmel
  • Rudolf Hrbek
  • Michael Wohlgemuth
  • Stephan Leibfried

Abstract

The EU suffers from a democratic deficit that arises not first and foremost from a lack of institutional competencies, but rather from the double weakness of politics vis-à-vis economics and law at the European level. This “functional democratic deficit” renders the existing mechanisms of democratic control increasingly ineffective. Especially for its citizens, a politically integrated Europen Union might be difficult to grasp, and it may only be reached gradually through a continuous process of dynamic development; however, “United in Diversity” seems to be the better alternative, and not only for historical reasons. The direct elections for the European Parliament, although not denying deficits of democratic legitimacy and participation at the Union level, should not be underestimated in their legitimising influence for the Union as an associated structure of members without obvious hierarchies. Copyright ZBW and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Kotzur & Andreas Grimmel & Rudolf Hrbek & Michael Wohlgemuth & Stephan Leibfried, 2014. "Vor der Europawahl: Wie lässt sich die demokratische Legitimität verbessern?," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 94(4), pages 239-257, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:94:y:2014:i:4:p:239-257
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-014-1664-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10273-014-1664-z
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10273-014-1664-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    A14; D72; H10;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:94:y:2014:i:4:p:239-257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.