IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v39y2025i5d10.1007_s11269-024-04055-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Assessment of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Long Short Term Memory Network (LSTM) and Hydrologic Engineering Centre-Hydrologic Modelling System (HEC-HMS) for Runoff Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Aparna M. Deulkar

    (JSPM’s Rajarshi Shahu College of Engineering)

  • Pradnya R. Dixit

    (Vishwakarma Institute of Information Technology)

  • Shreenivas N. Londhe

    (Vishwakarma Institute of Information Technology)

  • Rakesh K. Jain

    (JSPM’s Rajarshi Shahu College of Engineering)

Abstract

Rainfall runoff modelling is very crucial and efficient for basin management. In the current exercise, ANNs as shallow network, LSTM as Deep Learning Network and HEC-HMS as conceptual/numerical technique were used for forecasting one day in advance runoff at Shivade station located in upper Krishna basin, Maharashtra, India. Main focus of the present study is to emphasize comparative nature of the research and its goal of forecasting one-day ahead runoff using rainfall runoff process. The outcomes of two data-driven approaches (ANN and LSTM) are compared to a hard computing methodology (HEC-HMS) to determine best way for forecasting one-day runoff. Accuracy of the all models was judged by different error measures like correlation coefficient (r), Root Mean square error (RMSE), Mean Absolute error (MAE) and Coefficient of efficiency (CE). Present work is novel because model development uses limited basin data. Current work suggests that LSTM (r-0.75, RMSE-145.24 m3/s and CE-0.56) and ANN ((r-0.87, RMSE-129.78 m3/s and CE-0.63)) can be used at an operational level as a supportive (if not alternative) tool with a conceptual model like HEC-HMS which is basically based on physics of the process and it require exogeneous data. Another conclusion came from noticing similar results produced from both ANN and LSTM models is that ANN is sufficient to address the nonlinearity associated with the natural problem like rainfall runoff. Therefore it can said that additional hidden layers with larger memory structures, such as in LSTM may be required for modelling the rainfall runoff process at least in present work. However, LSTM requires additional investigations in different basins with more basin data to generalize this observation.

Suggested Citation

  • Aparna M. Deulkar & Pradnya R. Dixit & Shreenivas N. Londhe & Rakesh K. Jain, 2025. "Comparative Assessment of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Long Short Term Memory Network (LSTM) and Hydrologic Engineering Centre-Hydrologic Modelling System (HEC-HMS) for Runoff Modelling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(5), pages 2049-2068, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11269-024-04055-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-04055-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-024-04055-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-024-04055-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11269-024-04055-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.