IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v39y2025i5d10.1007_s11269-024-04013-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Flood Hazard Assessment Based on Machine Learning Model

Author

Listed:
  • Guoyi Li

    (Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University)

  • Weiwei Shao

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research)

  • Xin Su

    (The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute)

  • Yong Li

    (Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University)

  • Yi Zhang

    (Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University)

  • Tianxu Song

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, Institute of Water Resource and Hydropower Research)

Abstract

Floods are one of the most frequent natural disasters, and their occurrence usually results in enormous loss of life and property. The prediction of flood-prone locations is difficult due to climate change and human factors. In this study, K-means, BP, SVM and RF machine learning models were used for urban flood hazard assessment. A typical rainstorm (“2007.7.18”) occurrence in the study area was simulated based on the TELEMAC-2D hydrodynamic model. Based on the flood distribution, 3281 flood-prone and 2227 non-flood-prone points were extracted to constitute a sample dataset, which was used for training and testing of the machine learning model. The performance of the machine learning model was evaluated using five evaluation metrics (Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F-score, Root Mean Square Error) as well as ROC curves and AUC values. The results show that the RF algorithm can better utilize the metrics data and the model performance performance is optimally. Finally, the flood risk distribution map obtained from the machine learning model was compared with actual location of inundation to verify the accuracy of the model. In the risk distribution map obtained by BP model, 63.855% and 18.072% of the flood-prone points were located in the very high and high risk zones, respectively; In the risk distribution map obtained by the RF model, 43.373% and 36.145% of the flood-prone points were located in the very high and high risk zones, respectively. In this paper, the obtained flood risk assessment results can provide scientific references for urban flood risk management and flood prevention and drainage.

Suggested Citation

  • Guoyi Li & Weiwei Shao & Xin Su & Yong Li & Yi Zhang & Tianxu Song, 2025. "Urban Flood Hazard Assessment Based on Machine Learning Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(5), pages 1953-1970, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11269-024-04013-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-04013-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-024-04013-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-024-04013-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11269-024-04013-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.