IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v39y2025i2d10.1007_s11269-024-03995-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Application of Hybrid Bagging-Boosting Decision Trees Ensemble Model for Riverine Flood Susceptibility Mapping and Regional Risk Delineation

Author

Listed:
  • Javeria Sarwar

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics
    Allama Iqbal Open University)

  • Saud Ahmed Khan

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics)

  • Muhammad Azmat

    (National University of Sciences and Technology)

  • Faridoon Khan

    (Air University)

Abstract

Flood disasters have become the most prevalent natural phenomenon as a result of climate change and other environmental factors. Most countries are vulnerable to flooding, which is a serious hazard to human life worldwide and has negative effects on the physical, social, and economic spheres. The utilization of ensemble machine learning algorithms has experienced a significant increase in the field of machine learning due to their resilience and ability to handle data that contains noise. These algorithms enhance the precision of forecasts by blending the results from multiple feeble decision models. Therefore, the research is an endeavor to propose a novel hybrid bag-boost decision tree ensemble model for riverine flood susceptibility mapping. The ensemble model integrates four independent decision tree models namely, Random Forest (RF), Logistic Model Tree (LMT), Naïve Bayes Tree (NBT), and Reduced Error Pruning Tree (REPT). For susceptibility mapping, a spatial database is constructed by considering 5500 flood spots and an equivalent number of non-flood points. The flood conditioning factors considered for the research possess environmental, topographic and human induced factors. The dataset has been randomly segregated into sample sizes of 70% and 30% for training and validating the models, respectively. The performance of the proposed ensemble model is assessed by utilizing various statistical evaluation measures; accuracy, precision, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, Friedman test and Neymenyi test, and is compared with the stand-alone decision tree models. The performance outputs of the models revealed that the hybrid bag-boost decision tree ensemble model (RF-LMT-NBT-REPT) performed the best with a 99.5% accuracy level for the training sample and 98.9% for the validating sample. The inundation maps are hence acquired by utilizing the hybrid bag-boost ensemble model for the years 2022 and the predicted flood of 2032 and regional hazard analysis has been performed. The study proposes that the hybrid bag-boost decision tree ensemble model be utilized for an accurate and precise hydraulic modelling and susceptibility analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Javeria Sarwar & Saud Ahmed Khan & Muhammad Azmat & Faridoon Khan, 2025. "An Application of Hybrid Bagging-Boosting Decision Trees Ensemble Model for Riverine Flood Susceptibility Mapping and Regional Risk Delineation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(2), pages 547-577, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03995-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-03995-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-024-03995-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-024-03995-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03995-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.