Author
Listed:
- Ziyi Mei
(Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Key Laboratory of Digital Valley Science and Technology
China Three Gorges University)
- Tao Peng
(China Three Gorges University)
- Lu Chen
(Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Key Laboratory of Digital Valley Science and Technology
Tibet Agricultural & Animal Husbandry University)
- Vijay P. Singh
(Texas A&M University
UAE University)
- Bin Yi
(Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Key Laboratory of Digital Valley Science and Technology)
- Zhiyuan Leng
(Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Key Laboratory of Digital Valley Science and Technology)
- Xiaoxue Gan
(Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Key Laboratory of Digital Valley Science and Technology)
- Tao Xie
(Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Key Laboratory of Digital Valley Science and Technology)
Abstract
Simulation of watershed streamflow is essential for the prevention and control of flood and drought disasters. To improve streamflow simulation, a coupled SWAT-LSTM model was constructed by combining a conceptual process-based hydrological model—Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)—with a machine learning model—Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). The coupled model was applied to simulate the daily streamflow of the upper Huaihe River above the Xixian station from 1962 to 2010, which identified the optimal explanatory variables of the model and reduced streamflow simulation errors. Furthermore, four machine learning models, back propagation (BP) neural network, gated recurrent unit (GRU), support vector regression (SVR) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were chosen to assess the effectiveness of coupling SWAT with LSTM in streamflow simulation. Results showed that the coupled SWAT-LSTM model performed satisfactorily in streamflow simulation in the study area, with NSE reaching 0.90 and 0.85 in calibration and validation periods, respectively. The coupled model showed a significant improvement in simulating flood peak and average streamflow in each period, with mean NSE increasing by 0.24 compared to the standalone SWAT model. In comparison to other coupled models (i.e., SWAT-BP, SWAT-GRU, SWAT-SVR, and SWAT-XGB), the mean NSE of SWAT-LSTM exhibited an improvement of 0.02–0.16 during validation period. Furthermore, the coupled model effectively avoided the overfitting problem and had better generalization performance. The findings of this study offer new ideas for streamflow simulation of watersheds and provide references for water resources management and planning.
Suggested Citation
Ziyi Mei & Tao Peng & Lu Chen & Vijay P. Singh & Bin Yi & Zhiyuan Leng & Xiaoxue Gan & Tao Xie, 2025.
"Coupling SWAT and LSTM for Improving Daily Streamflow Simulation in a Humid and Semi-humid River Basin,"
Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(1), pages 397-418, January.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03975-w
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-03975-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03975-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.