Author
Listed:
- Mohammad Tavosi
(Tarbiat Modares University)
- Mehdi Vafakhah
(Tarbiat Modares University)
- Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi
(Tarbiat Modares University)
- Sayed M. Bateni
(University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Abstract
The state of a watershed is determined by its hydrological conditions, which themselves are dependent on the security of the individual components of the watershed such as economic, social, ecological and infrastructure. While the role of stakeholders in watershed management is vital and their opinions are very effective in management and the assessment of watershed hydrological security (WHS). Therefore, this research aims to evaluate WHS from economic and social perspectives based on stakeholder opinions surrounding the Gorganroud watershed in Iran. The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models including VlseKriterijumska Optimizcija I Kaompromisno Resenje (VIKOR), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS), and Elimination and Choice in Translating to Reality (ELECTRE) were used to prioritize the sub-watersheds according to eight economic, social, and infrastructural variables. Shannon's entropy was used to compute the weight of these variables in the MCDM models. To validate the models, the percentage of variation (∆P) and intensity of variation (∆I) were used. The results showed that the application of indigenous knowledge in water management had the highest entropy with a weight of 0.327 (33%). The water-dependent livelihoods variable had the lowest entropy and weight but was still considered a key variable in WHS due to its consistently high scores among stakeholders. When ranking the sub-watersheds in terms of WHS, the sub-watersheds A9 and A3 were ranked first and last, respectively, for all five MCDM models, with the rankings of the other sub-watersheds differing between the models. A comparison of the evaluation indices showed that COPRAS (∆P = 38.75) and ELECTRE (∆I = 4.805) were the best-performing MCDM models for the WHS ranking of the Gorganroud watershed. The strategy proposed by the present study can facilitate the effective management of the Gorganroud watershed and ensure its sustainable development, and also provide the possibility of effective application of this strategy in another watersheds. Graphical Abstract
Suggested Citation
Mohammad Tavosi & Mehdi Vafakhah & Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi & Sayed M. Bateni, 2025.
"Sub-watershed Prioritization Based on Watershed Hydrological Security Using Different Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods,"
Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(1), pages 65-90, January.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03957-y
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-03957-y
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03957-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.