IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v38y2024i14d10.1007_s11269-024-03932-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relating the Drought Precipitation Percentiles Index to the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) under Influence of Aridity and Timescale

Author

Listed:
  • Tayeb Raziei

    (Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)
    Universidade de Lisboa)

  • Luis Santos Pereira

    (Universidade de Lisboa)

Abstract

The Precipitation Deciles Index (DI) and the Precipitation Percentiles Index (PI) are statistically related to the Standardised Precipitation Index (SPI). However, that relation varies, namely with the dryness of the location. This study, therefore, aims at comparing these indices using monthly precipitation totals from 1971 to 2017 using data of 45 weather stations distributed throughout Iran, so having different climates. Several statistical indicators were used to compare the indices, with the respective results showing good agreement in all climates. The study confirms the adequateness of the PI, which is highly comparable to the SPI despite they were calculated using different probability distribution functions, and consists of a simple and robust alternative approach relative to the SPI. It results in a new drought index called Normalized Percentiles Index (NPI), which is obtained when standardizing/normalizing the PI values. Conversely, it was obtained the Percentiled SPI Index (PSPI), which corresponds to the ranking the SPI values, which have shown a more understandable representation of SPI values for use with stakeholders and the public. These conversions facilitate direct comparisons between SPI and PI using statistical indicators commonly adopted to compare continuous variables. The differences between PI and SPI were negligeable or modest in most of climates of Iran, but quite noticeable in arid climates, and when SPI was calculated at shorter timescales. The observed differences were attributed to incorrect distribution fitting in SPI calculations rather than to inadequacy of PI. The current study recommends using either PI or NPI as an alternative to SPI, namely in arid climates, as PI is easier to calculate, more robust and easier to understand than the SPI.

Suggested Citation

  • Tayeb Raziei & Luis Santos Pereira, 2024. "Relating the Drought Precipitation Percentiles Index to the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) under Influence of Aridity and Timescale," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(14), pages 5739-5758, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:14:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03932-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-03932-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-024-03932-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-024-03932-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tayeb Raziei & Morteza Miri, 2023. "An Alternative Approach for Computing the Standardized Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI)," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(10), pages 4123-4141, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:14:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03932-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.